1 edit
@avalanchethecat saidYou and I were having a nice conversation about the theory of evolution until I asked for evidence and didn’t accept your desperate attempts to change the subject to creationism.
I do not think this is true. I don't think you do either.
Then you started in with the insults and I started tweaking you by calling you champ and winking at you.
Until you started insulting me, I wasn’t tweaking you at all. Same goes for the other atheists.
1 edit
@avalanchethecat saidLooks like you ran out of gas.
I do not think this is true. I don't think you do either.
Couldn’t get any mileage out of that comment and you spent all that time looking for it.
Too funny 😂
Edit: PB1022 wins again! 🎉 🎊 🎈
@avalanchethecat saidDidn’t lie at all nor did you demonstrate that.
What are you on about? You were shown to have lied, how do you count that as a "win"?
And you didn’t demonstrate that ‘cause I didn’t do it.
You, on the other hand, have told quite a few whoppers in here and are obviously upset at getting caught.
Ya gotta mind your P’s and Q’s when ol’ PB’s patrolling the forums.
You’ve got a reputation for telling whoppers and your every utterance is now under PB’s microscope.
@pb1022 saidYou lied, it was proven. You are now resorting to your tired 'whopper' troll attempt again - the thirtieth time or thereabouts - in a weak attempt at changing the subject.
Didn’t lie at all nor did you demonstrate that.
And you didn’t demonstrate that ‘cause I didn’t do it.
You, on the other hand, have told quite a few whoppers in here and are obviously upset at getting caught.
Ya gotta mind your P’s and Q’s when ol’ PB’s patrolling the forums.
You’ve got a reputation for telling whoppers and your every utterance is now under PB’s microscope.
@avalanchethecat saidWhat was my alleged lie?
You lied, it was proven. You are now resorting to your tired 'whopper' troll attempt again - the thirtieth time or thereabouts - in a weak attempt at changing the subject.
That I tweak atheists?
Sure, I tweak ‘em - after they tweak me.
Same with believers.
Like I said before, I’m an equal opportunity tweaker.
But your attempt to claim I lied is LOL funny compared to the whoppers you’ve told.
Think about it: You actually said you read the Gospels a “whole bunch of times” after becoming an atheist even though you don’t believe them and find them so objectionable you can only tolerate reading small quantities at a time.
You then tried to get out of that whopper by saying you liked to discuss the Gospels with your uncle, which was undoubtedly another whopper.
1 edit
@pb1022 said31
What was my alleged lie?
That I tweak atheists?
Sure, I tweak ‘em - after they tweak me.
Same with believers.
Like I said before, I’m an equal opportunity tweaker.
But your attempt to claim I lied is LOL funny compared to the whoppers you’ve told.
Think about it: You actually said you read the Gospels a “whole bunch of times” after becoming an atheist even th ...[text shortened]... r by saying you liked to discuss the Gospels with your uncle, which was undoubtedly another whopper.
You don't believe that I have read, and do read, the Gospels. That's your opinion. You have been proven a liar twice. Once when you said you were using 'champ' as a term of endearment, once when you said you don't discriminate on the basis of a person's religion.
@avalanchethecat saidOh I believe you’ve read the Gospels.
31
You don't believe that I have read, and do read, the Gospels. That's your opinion. You have been proven a liar twice. Once when you said you were using 'champ' as a term of endearment, once when you said you don't discriminate on the basis of a person's religion.
But not a “whole bunch of times” after becoming an atheist.
That was your whopper and you’ll never live it down.
And now that you’re under PB1022’s microscope, you better tell your whoppers somewhere else.
