23 Jul 06
Well folks,
I've been challenged to a debate on science by Royaltystatement. We'll use a standard debating style, similar to those used by DoctorScribbles in the debates forum. Once a choice of topic has been decided, and suitable judges appointed, we'll have three posts (although multiple posts are allowed if the text won't fit in one) each, and the winner voted on by the judges.
Royaltystatement, I propose we debate "Biblical creationism vs. Science". I propose we have a fair, unbiased jedge set. For this reason, I propose 5 judges. My choices for these judges would be; KellyJay, Halitose, UmbridgeofSnow and Telerion. These judges (should they accept) will, between them, appoint a fifth judge. This should prevent unnecesary bias by either of us.
Do you accept, Royaltystatement?
23 Jul 06
Originally posted by scottishinnzthis debate is one sided, clearly one is much smarter than the other though i will not say who lol
Well folks,
I've been challenged to a debate on science by Royaltystatement. We'll use a standard debating style, similar to those used by DoctorScribbles in the debates forum. Once a choice of topic has been decided, and suitable judges appointed, we'll have three posts (although multiple posts are allowed if the text won't fit in one) each, and t ...[text shortened]... This should prevent unnecesary bias by either of us.
Do you accept, Royaltystatement?
23 Jul 06
Originally posted by scottishinnzThe Debate has already begun.
Well folks,
I've been challenged to a debate on science by Royaltystatement. We'll use a standard debating style, similar to those used by DoctorScribbles in the debates forum. Once a choice of topic has been decided, and suitable judges appointed, we'll have three posts (although multiple posts are allowed if the text won't fit in one) each, and t ...[text shortened]... This should prevent unnecesary bias by either of us.
Do you accept, Royaltystatement?
23 Jul 06
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomYou weren't even worthy to be selected judge. And you cannot create a proper insult about me.
this debate is one sided, clearly one is much smarter than the other though i will not say who lol
If it is your wish to insult me you may do so.
But it only reflects the fact that my intellect surpasses yours.
23 Jul 06
Originally posted by royaltystatementwho said i was talking about you? thats hypocritical calling yourself intellectual and then assuming im calling you dumb.
You weren't even worthy to be selected judge. And you cannot create a proper insult about me.
If it is your wish to insult me you may do so.
But it only reflects the fact that my intellect surpasses yours.
23 Jul 06
Originally posted by scottishinnzHave you read my comment?
Not until we have judges, and formalised rules of debate it hasn't.
I have PM'd the proposed judges. Are my suggestions okay with you, or would you like to suggest another two christian and two non-christian judges?
Pick whatever judges you desire, I donot object.
Win or........ I will remain with GOD and the Christ and I doubt that you will seek repentance.
I understand this and know that because of who you are and because of who I am, we will NEVER agree where matters of religion, philosophy, of the creation of life are concerned. I am only willing to entertain this debate to silence to voices of blasphemy.
Choose as you wish, I am here. Though it is pointless to.
I am here.
23 Jul 06
Originally posted by royaltystatementJudges do not get involved in the debate. I asked the individuals noted to be judges because, whilst I do not always agree with them (Huh, Kelly!), they are representative of the "spirituality" group. I could have asked many others, such as FreakyKBH, googlefudge, Ecstremevenom, SpiritM8ageress, Nordly (who would be my choice for 5th judge, incidentally) etc. It's not based on "worthyness", quite whatever that is.
You weren't even worthy to be selected judge. And you cannot create a proper insult about me.
If it is your wish to insult me you may do so.
But it only reflects the fact that my intellect surpasses yours.
Others are free to post here as they will.
23 Jul 06
1 edit
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomDon't try to validate yourself or your actions. I know your words. And by your opposition to me I know your mind. Try to fool the narrowminded, not the wise.
who said i was talking about you? thats hypocritical calling yourself intellectual and then assuming im calling you dumb.
23 Jul 06
Originally posted by scottishinnzMy post was not to you it was to he who attempted to disguise his insult.
Judges do not get involved in the debate. I asked the individuals noted to be judges because, whilst I do not always agree with them (Huh, Kelly!), they are representative of the "spirituality" group. I could have asked many others, such as FreakyKBH, googlefudge, Ecstremevenom, SpiritM8ageress, Nordly (who would be my choice for 5th judge, incidental ...[text shortened]... ased on "worthyness", quite whatever that is.
Others are free to post here as they will.