04 Nov '16 13:44>
Originally posted by sonshipI didn't expect you to actually address the specific definition of "joyless" that I offered you, so no surprises here.
A real "joyless" meeting of the brothers and sisters in Rome Italy.
Originally posted by SuzianneClass II - possible in the long term with major advancements in technology
I have not read this book, but I may have to seek it out.
Tell me this: in which class did he put time travel (particularly into the past)? I ask, because Einstein seems to have called it impossible, now and forever, given the constraints of his theories.
Originally posted by sh76I have that Kip Thorne book you mention.
Class II - possible in the long term with major advancements in technology
Kip Thorne also has a chapter on time travel in his excellent book "Black Holes and Time Warps."
Essentially, time travel is possible by taking two ends of a wormhole and having one end travel extremely quickly or exposing it to intense gravitational pull for a period of time. Sinc ...[text shortened]... I won't name and got back a "stop emailing me" in response. Anyway, just thought I'd share that.
Originally posted by divegeesterWell, I must say that I enjoyed the small glimpse into your belief system instead of the usual "calling out" of others because of their beliefs. It seems like a better way to fellowship.
Thank you.
I don't generally regard this place as somewhere I normally wish to discuss "Christian" things as there is too much polarity of thinking even among those calling themselves "Christian", also complete disdain and outright loathing from others. However, occasionally I see somewhere I can humbly add value.
Despite my somewhat combative online ...[text shortened]... ersona I don't regard myself highly in Christian terms, but I do enjoy contending for the truth.
Originally posted by SuzianneIt pleases me that you liked it, but you need to accept that I am not here to "fellowship" in any sense of the word and I enjoy challenging religionist people about their strange, antisocial and sometimes horrendous beliefs.
Well, I must say that I enjoyed the small glimpse into your belief system instead of the usual "calling out" of others because of their beliefs. It seems like a better way to fellowship.
Originally posted by divegeesterI had an entire paragraph typed up here, but I'll keep it short and just say that that's really too bad. I'm sorry you feel this way.
It pleases me that you liked it, but you need to accept that I am not here to "fellowship" in any sense of the word and I enjoy challenging religionist people about their strange, antisocial and sometimes horrendous beliefs.
Originally posted by SuzianneI don't understand at all why you feel bad about this. This is just a forum board and hardly a representation of life.
I had an entire paragraph typed up here, but I'll keep it short and just say that that's really too bad. I'm sorry you feel this way.
Originally posted by divegeesterBecause after all, there are no humans on the internet, eh?
I don't understand at all why you feel bad about this. This is just a forum board and hardly a representation of life.
Thanks for sparing me the paragraph; small mercies and all that 😛
Originally posted by SuzianneI don't bully anyone and you cannot demonstrate otherwise. I've never been reprimanded by a moderator for bullying and I resent the accusation. However I've come to expect nothing more from you; you add nothing whatsoever to these forums, you just lumber from thread to thread accusing people you don't like of bullying.
Because after all, there are no humans on the internet, eh?
Why show any humanity at all, right?
Heck, no, especially when your time could be better spent bullying people and laughing at them.
Originally posted by SuzianneBut weren't you, yourself - just the other day - dismissing Young Earth Creationist Christians as "pinheads"? Is that an example of 'Suzianne fellowships' (verb)?
Well, I must say that I enjoyed the small glimpse into your belief system instead of the usual "calling out" of others because of their beliefs. It seems like a better way to fellowship.
Originally posted by FMFI really think the innuendo of your "question" seems to be that lack of evidence for fulfilled prophecy perhaps makes no difference to me.
Do you think the prophecy is being fulfilled regardless of whether or not they decide to go ahead with building a third temple?