Doubt good, certainty bad

-Removed-

Despite your deceptive trickery and failure to read the article that you quoted from in
full, what have you to say for yourself, clearly you are being misled and seem to relish
in the fact? and look how your deception was unearthed reflecting badly upon you? stay
clear of apostates, they do not have your best interests at heart.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
seeing that you have no alternative to offer other than your own self certified opinions and are simply content to promulgate them to others despite their lack of efficacy

What makes you think I am claiming my opinions are "certified" in any way?

what makes you think they have any more spiritual content than a stone?

Because a stone does not have any spiritual dimension whatsoever, as far as humans are aware. Is that your verdict, robbie, for having different beliefs from you: FMF has no "spiritual dimension whatsoever"... like a "stone"?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Despite your deceptive trickery and failure to read the article that you quoted from in
full, what have you to say for yourself, clearly you are being misled and seem to relish
in the fact? and look how your deception was unearthed reflecting badly upon you? stay
clear of apostates, they do not have your best interests at heart.

divegeester is an apostate in your view?

-Removed-

please read the full article, which you never did prior to posting your third part hate
sight quotation, it explains our stance rather well. Oh where did you get the quotation
from, you have not cited the source?

Originally posted by FMF
divegeester is an apostate in your view?

I have answered this already, he has engaged in apostasy , he is an apostate.

Originally posted by FMF
What makes you think I am claiming my opinions are "certified" in any way?

[b]what makes you think they have any more spiritual content than a stone?

Because a stone does not have any spiritual dimension whatsoever, as far as humans are aware. Is that your verdict, robbie, for having different beliefs from you: FMF has no "spiritual dimension whatsoever"... like a "stone"?[/b]

clearly you believe they have some merit, do you not?

-Removed-

yes it was trickery because it was taken out of context, secondly you had not read the
article, further adding to either youir deception or your willingness to be led along, I
cannot say which. I have no dilemma, the article is very clear and has as its basis a
number of scriptural principles which form its basis, which you have failed to either
read (likely) or to comprehend, (even more likely). Indeed if you had read it and
understood it, you would not be asserting that i have a dilemma, for clearly i do not, as
explained in the article.

-Removed-

firstly i dont care about thumbs, this is not the general forum, secondly, you do not
have to belong to an organisation to actively promulgate ideas against its interests, do
you. In fact, you are doing it right now, are you not?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
clearly you believe they have some merit, do you not?

Do you seriously believe I have no more spiritual content than "a stone"?

Dasa never went that far. He always restricted his spiritual smackdown analogies to living things like cockroaches, dogs, rats.

-Removed-

the quoted article is there in full, anyone that wishes can read its contents (something
you failed to do prior to posting) and if they have any questions i shall be free to
answer them. Indeed you have still not stated from which hate sight you frequented
and gleaned the partial quotation, doctored and taken out of context, why not?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes it was trickery because it was taken out of context

The full quote is every bit as ugly and misanthropic as the snippet that divegeester used to drew attention to the article's existence.

the quoted article is there in full, anyone that wishes can read its contents (something you failed to do prior to posting) and if they have any questions i shall be free to answer them.

I have read it. It's meaning is clear. The quotes divegeester encapsulated it perfectly and it was interesting to find that out when I saw the full article. No questions for you.