22 Dec 11
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper Knob[/b]I don't think he meant the Tyrannosaurus Rex was one of the dinosaurs
Found it.
Thread Given enough time anything can happen, really! page 19 Thread 138818
The exact exchange -
PK - Kelly, dinosaur fossils have been found with fossils inside their stomachs. Look at the teeth of carnivorous dinosaurs they're for eating meat. What did a T-Rex eat? Spinach salad??
KJ - ...[text shortened]... ey would have had to also end up on the Ark as well along with all the other kinds.
that Noah took on the Ark. He only mentioned it as a possible meat eater
after Adam and Eve sinned. I could be wrong, but I did not get that as
his meaning. Maybe, this is something you need to get clarification from
him directly. I am thinking he meant dinosaurs like the Gila Monster were
taken on the Ark.
22 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsA gila monster isn't a dinosaur.
I don't think he meant the Tyrannosaurus Rex was one of the dinosaurs
that Noah took on the Ark. He only mentioned it as a possible meat eater
after Adam and Eve sinned. I could be wrong, but I did not get that as
his meaning. Maybe, this is something you need to get clarification from
him directly. I am thinking he meant dinosaurs like the Gila Monster were
taken on the Ark.
22 Dec 11
2 edits
Originally posted by avalanchethecatThe word dinosaur comes from the Greek, deinos, “fearful”, plus
A gila monster isn't a dinosaur.
sauros, “lizard”. I believe that word easily applies to a gila monster
since it has a fearsome reputation due to its venomous nature.
http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Animals/ReptilesAmphibians/Facts/FactSheets/Gilamonster.cfm
22 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsI'm sure he'll let us know when he returns.
I don't think he meant the Tyrannosaurus Rex was one of the dinosaurs
that Noah took on the Ark. He only mentioned it as a possible meat eater
after Adam and Eve sinned. I could be wrong, but I did not get that as
his meaning. Maybe, this is something you need to get clarification from
him directly. I am thinking he meant dinosaurs like the Gila Monster were
taken on the Ark.
22 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsNo, no, no.
The word dinosaur comes from the Greek, deinos, “fearful”, plus
sauros, “lizard”. I believe that word easily applies to a gila monster
since it has a fearsome reputation due to its venomous nature.
http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Animals/ReptilesAmphibians/Facts/FactSheets/Gilamonster.cfm
Dinosaur -
Dinosaurs are a diverse group of animals of the clade and superorder Dinosauria. They were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (about 230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous (about 65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event led to the extinction of all non-avian dinosaurs at the close of the Mesozoic era.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur
22 Dec 11
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobThat is the modern definiton based on the belief in the theory of evolution.
No, no, no.
Dinosaur -
Dinosaurs are a diverse group of animals of the clade and superorder Dinosauria. They were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (about 230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous (about 65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction ...[text shortened]... ian dinosaurs at the close of the Mesozoic era.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur
I was referring to the origin of the word and its original meaning.
P.S. Possible dinosaurs in the Holy Bible
http://christianity.about.com/od/whatdoesthebiblesay/a/Dinosaurs-Bible.htm
22 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsOh, so when you said "...dinosaurs like the Gila Monster..." you were using the term 'dinosaur' in a different way from everybody else, right, I see. You know, this might go some way towards explaining some of your other posts. Do you arbitrarily redefine a lot of words?
That is the modern definiton based on the belief in the theory of evolution.
I was referring to the origin of the word and its original meaning.
P.S. Possible dinosaurs in the Holy Bible
http://christianity.about.com/od/whatdoesthebiblesay/a/Dinosaurs-Bible.htm
23 Dec 11
Originally posted by avalanchethecatYou should know by now that I do not believe in the "theory of Evolution",
Oh, so when you said "...dinosaurs like the Gila Monster..." you were using the term 'dinosaur' in a different way from everybody else, right, I see. You know, this might go some way towards explaining some of your other posts. Do you arbitrarily redefine a lot of words?
so a definition based on that theory is in error.
23 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsyou problem is, you know nothing about the theory of evolution and any comment you have to make on the topic stems from ignorance. educate yourself then talk.
The problem is that the evolutionist do not have a consistent theory from
start to finish that can be supported. Therefore, they will need help from
other branches of science. Otherwise, their theory is useless and is only
speculation.
23 Dec 11
Originally posted by VoidSpiritI know about the theory of evolution. It is all these books making
you problem is, you know nothing about the theory of evolution and any comment you have to make on the topic stems from ignorance. educate yourself then talk.
false claims about how this and that evidence support the theory
that I have not read and don't need to in order to know is is nothing
but hogwash.
23 Dec 11
Originally posted by RJHindsyou've never read the books and have no idea what they say.
I know about the theory of evolution. It is all these books making
false claims about how this and that evidence support the theory
that I have not read and don't need to in order to know is is nothing
but hogwash.
- Joined
- 06 Aug 07
- Moves
- 8299
23 Dec 11
As a Christian and a scientist I believe that evolution is a scientific fact and does nothing to disprove nor prove the existance of God. It may have been a theory many years ago but for those who understand science and the scientific method evolution is no longer a "theory". Charlse Darwin was a brilliant man and would have no doubt been truly amazed by the discover of DNA. Which by the way proves Darwin's discovery in unimaginable ways.
23 Dec 11
2 edits
Originally posted by kbear1kThe discovery of DNA proves intelligent design due to the information code
As a Christian and a scientist I believe that evolution is a scientific fact and does nothing to disprove nor prove the existance of God. It may have been a theory many years ago but for those who understand science and the scientific method evolution is no longer a "theory". Charlse Darwin was a brilliant man and would have no doubt been truly amazed by the discover of DNA. Which by the way proves Darwin's discovery in unimaginable ways.
contained in there. It proves that biological systems do not occur by
random chance, but by a computer like program that tells them how to
come together. The intelligence behind this is obviously the creator God
of the Holy Bible unless you can come up with another source for this
super intellect.
P.S. What you believe is scientific fact is nothing more than adaptation,
which you have been told is evolution and you are too stupid to realize.
Sorry to have to bust your bubble like that.