Originally posted by ZahlanziI do not think it was how high the tower was going to be that was the issue.
do you believe it is reasonable to assume that about 100 years after the big flood wiped almost all humanity off the face of the world, the humans managed to form a civilisation so advanced that they built a tower so big it pissed off god? taken from the bible.
but putting the bible aside, how do you explain the Egyptian civilisation (and every other ci ...[text shortened]... ians after the flood? with no record of "omr (oh my Ra), why does it keep raining, save us Ra"
It was going to be what would become of the human race had it completed it.
Kelly
Originally posted by Proper Knob1. You can look up the data on time and scripture if you want to know there
We have gone down a similar path to this one, not this exact one. Of course, you are free to ask me any questions and i will answer them as honestly as i can.
[b]1. The flood occured about 1600 years after creation if my memory is correct.
Do you have an exact(ish) date for creation. I've probably asked you before but i have forgotten. I'm tryi ...[text shortened]... o believe something which gives you an explanation i choose to remain open minded.[/b]
are several works that can give you much more detail than I'm willing to give
due to the time it takes. Example: http://bibletimeline.info/
2. How long they got back? No, it was how long it took them to get to where
they were going. I imagine the time wasn't that long.
3. The land mass split could have happened a number of ways from an earth
quake we know that the land can shift why would it be a huge surprise to have
it have it happened quickly where life got sorted out and that which would and
could survive did where it ended up, and that which couldn't didn't?
4. You think of yourself as opened minded about your views on the beginning
of all things. Okay, if you are open minded what do you think you could learn
that can show you one way or another how it began? What is it you are looking
for? Seriously, you do have an issue of something from nothing...there anything
at all that gives you some answer about that?
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayWhen did Proper Knob demonstrate he was open minded to the creation
1. You can look up the data on time and scripture if you want to know there
are several works that can give you much more detail than I'm willing to give
due to the time it takes. Example: http://bibletimeline.info/
2. How long they got back? No, it was how long it took them to get to where
they were going. I imagine the time wasn't that long.
3. T ...[text shortened]... omething from nothing...there anything
at all that gives you some answer about that?
Kelly
story? I don't think so.
Originally posted by wolfgang59Its one of several that can give dates by events according to scripture.
Thats a funny site!
"All dates are approximate" as title
First entry: Before Time lol
🙄
You having nothing besides that as well, even those that think the universe
is billions of years old would assign certain things by the time range they
think they fell in. At some point you have to have a fixed point of reference or
you have nothing.
Kelly
3 edits
Originally posted by wolfgang59When evolutionary scientist give all those approximate dates it is just fine,
Thats a funny site!
"All dates are approximate" as title
First entry: Before Time lol
🙄
while creationist must give exact dates. Why is that?
P.S. Evolutionary scientist say everything came into existence by a big
bang that has no cause. Lol. 😀
Originally posted by RJHindsthat's not at all what they say. that is however, the ignorant creationist claim of what they say.
When evolutionary scientist give all those approximate dates it is just fine,
while creationist must give exact dates. Why is that?
P.S. Evolutionary scientist say everything came into existence by a big
bang that has no cause. Lol. 😀
Originally posted by VoidSpiritThey must be ignorant then, or they do not agree with other scientists.
evolutionary scientists have nothing at all to say about the big bang. that's a theory from the field of cosmology.
So they don't have to fit it all together. That is for others to do. All
they are have to do is declare evolution is a fact without backing their
claim up. Others are suppose to do that because they only have to
argue that adaptation is really evolution. How convienent for them.
Originally posted by RJHindsdo you enjoy being an ignoramus? how does it profit you?
They must be ignorant then, or they do not agree with other scientists.
So they don't have to fit it all together. That is for others to do. All
they are have to do is declare evolution is a fact without backing their
claim up. Others are suppose to do that because they only have to
argue that adaptation is really evolution. How convienent for them.
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat was funny was "Before Time"
When evolutionary scientist give all those approximate dates it is just fine,
while creationist must give exact dates. Why is that?
P.S. Evolutionary scientist say everything came into existence by a big
bang that has no cause. Lol. 😀
what on earth is "Before Time" ???