Originally posted by RJHindsI think it safe to say no matter what transpires, if someone comes up with a way to make life from amino acids and such, you faith will be unshaken. Don't confuse me with facts, my mind is made up.
I am not sure. I suppose the early earth conditions could have happened
by chance. So that seems okay to that point. We will have to see how
things advance from there.
Originally posted by KellyJayI see we're reached the impasse we normally end up at.
The evidence is the same, its how its viewed that is different. We do not live
in two different universes where one gets one set of data and the other
another set. You have assumptions about events that may or may not have
taken place when you think they could have, your assumptions could be right
or wrong, so the word "overwehlming" just means you seem to agree with it
nothing more.
Kelly
The evidence is the same, its how its viewed that is different.
I view the evidence in light of scientific understanding, you view it in light of your chosen religious beliefs.
We do not live in two different universes where one gets one set of data and the other another set.
As i said above you choose and view the evidence in light of your chosen religious beliefs. You start at a conclusion and work backwards.
so the word "overwehlming" just means you seem to agree with it nothing more
Overwhelming means overwhelming. Every single scientific discipline puts the age of earth and all life in it considerably over a few thousand years old.
Originally posted by Proper KnobYou view the evidence in light of how you think it all started and so do I so that
I see we're reached the impasse we normally end up at.
[b]The evidence is the same, its how its viewed that is different.
I view the evidence in light of scientific understanding, you view it in light of your chosen religious beliefs.
We do not live in two different universes where one gets one set of data and the other another set.
...[text shortened]... scipline puts the age of earth and all life in it considerably over a few thousand years old.[/b]
means....assumptions are brought up and everything is colored by them. You
are deluding yourself if you think it is anything else.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayThe man who thinks 8 humans lived aboard a big wooden boat with Tyrannosaurus Rex's, vegetarian ones at that, is calling me deluded.
You view the evidence in light of how you think it all started and so do I so that
means....assumptions are brought up and everything is colored by them. You
are deluding yourself if you think it is anything else.
Kelly
My views are backed up by centuries of scientific endeavor, yours have been plucked out of thin air. That's the way it is. The fact remains that if your version of history was backed by science you wouldn't be complaining.
Originally posted by Proper KnobYou view the evidence in light of scientific misunderstanding. 😏
I see we're reached the impasse we normally end up at.
[b]The evidence is the same, its how its viewed that is different.
I view the evidence in light of scientific understanding, you view it in light of your chosen religious beliefs.
We do not live in two different universes where one gets one set of data and the other another set.
...[text shortened]... scipline puts the age of earth and all life in it considerably over a few thousand years old.[/b]
3 edits
Originally posted by Proper KnobTyrannosaurus Rex's were not saved through the worldwide flood.
The man who thinks 8 humans lived aboard a big wooden boat with Tyrannosaurus Rex's, vegetarian ones at that, is calling me deluded.
My views are backed up by centuries of scientific endeavor, yours have been plucked out of thin air. That's the way it is. The fact remains that if your version of history was backed by science you wouldn't be complaining.
You are deluded if you thank that.
P.S. You do think that so that proves you are deluded. 😏
Where do you get these centuries from?
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsI don't think that, KellyJay does!!! Wake up and turn your brian on. Maybe we could plug your chess engine into your brain, we might get more sense out of you.
Tyrannosaurus Rex's were not saved through the worldwide flood.
You are deluded if you thank that.
P.S. You do think that so that proves you are delude. 😏
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsFound it.
Where is the post that he said Tyrannosaurus Rex's were on the ark?
I can't believe he said such a thing.
Thread Given enough time anything can happen, really! page 19 Thread 138818
The exact exchange -
PK - Kelly, dinosaur fossils have been found with fossils inside their stomachs. Look at the teeth of carnivorous dinosaurs they're for eating meat. What did a T-Rex eat? Spinach salad??
KJ - I said in the beginning nothing ate meat, that changed obviously or there would be nothing eating meat today! Scripturally not only would man and the dinosaurs have to live together they would have had to also end up on the Ark as well along with all the other kinds.