Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Proof

@galveston75 said
Perhaps you should read these scriptures to get a better understanding of what Jehovah God has done for all of mankind, including you.
As far as man is looking out into space, there is not another planet that is even close to our planet earth that could even start to keep a human alive. This planet was created perfectly for humans to live on until guess who reined it f ...[text shortened]... seem to be. Tiny little humans.....

Genesis 1:27-31; 2:7-9, 15-23; Psalm 115:16; Matthew 19:4-6

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Have you been to all the other planets to substantiate your assertion?

Across the universe hospitable plans almost certainly abound. Again, this idea of humans being special on a special planet positively reeks of ego.

Note: I have provided extraordinary proof, which is food and water, and have only been met with the theory that it's man's ego to think that God created us, and provided not just food....but delicious food in an endless variety.

It's no wonder that the "manna" provided by God in Exodus didn't go over well, because imagine if humans had to eat just manna for their entire life.

Edit: correction made. 😀

@kellyjay said
Suggesting you know it didn't happen that way, but cannot show how it did, doesn't?

@chaney3 said
Note: I have provided extraordinary proof, which is food and water, and have only been met with the theory that it's man's ego to think that God created us, and provided not just food....but delicious food in an endless variety.

It's no wonder that the "manna" provided by God in Exodus didn't go over well, because imagine if humans had to eat just manna for their entire life.

Edit: correction made. 😀

@ghost-of-a-duke said
No sir, the whole food/water thing is an especially lame attempt at providing proof and easily rebuffed. (As it has been).

What else you got?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
How does that figure? - Galveston said, 'there is not another planet that is even close to our planet earth that could even start to keep a human alive.' While I said, 'hospitable planets almost certainly abound.'

Which one of us is asserting something definitively?

@chaney3 said
Do you just view food and water existing on earth as an enormous coincidence, due to the fact that we could not survive without them?

(Later I'll be discussing the earth, moon and sun....regarding their placements relative to each other)

@kellyjay said
Both, you can say A and not A are both something definitively stated, you disagree un-definitively?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Look old chap, all the key elements needed to be in place for life to exist. Earth met these requirements (the right distance from the sun etc) while a planet like Saturn did not. If Earth hadn't met these requirements then we simply wouldn't be here. In that sense, yes, we were lucky. In the vastness of space (which is mind-numbingly huge) other planets too will have gotten lucky. The idea that we were the only one is just poor math.

@chaney3 said
You have admitted to "luck", which is refreshing.

I don't view it as luck, but "design", which is where we obviously disagree.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Look old chap, all the key elements needed to be in place for life to exist. Earth met these requirements (the right distance from the sun etc) while a planet like Saturn did not. If Earth hadn't met these requirements then we simply wouldn't be here. In that sense, yes, we were lucky. In the vastness of space (which is mind-numbingly huge) other planets too will have gotten lucky. The idea that we were the only one is just poor math.

@kellyjay said
Poor math, how much math do you use when looking at all of the things that had to be just right for this planet here to support life, not just little things either like the placement of this planet, but the make up of the universe, how it all reacts to itself? How much math is required to actually have the ability to understand anything let alone ourselves and the universe w ...[text shortened]... ce in the universe and life is too good in my opinion for luck to be in play, nothing is that lucky.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I just don't think you fully comprehend how massive the universe is. (And by math I refer to probability).

There are about 10 billion galaxies in the observable universe! The number of stars in a galaxy varies, but assuming an average of 100 billion stars per galaxy means that there are about 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (that's 1 billion trillion) stars in the observable universe.

https://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=3775

@caissad4

Okay, you have no proof for your extraordinary claim.
But, an extraordinary claim DOES require extraordinary proof.