1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsI should have said Radioactive Isotope Dating.
Carbon dating does not work on fossils, Ms Know Nothing.
The Instructor
Actually Carbon dating does work on fossils but is inconclusive over 50,000 years, given the half-life of 5700 years for Carbon 14. For anything older than that, they can use Potassium 40 or Uranium 238 or even Thorium 232.
Originally posted by RJHindsYou decry Islam, and yet you still seek to keep women down with your supposedly 'God-given' command that women cannot even control their own bodies. Pathetic.
I want all to have the rights they deserve, even the unborn. We have no right to kill the innocent unborn babies no matter what man says. God does not give anyone that right, Ms Woman Libber.
The Instructor
Originally posted by SuzianneI have no problem with women taking contraceptives as a birth control measure. I just don't think she has the right to kill the body of an innocent baby that she is given the duty and honor of caring for, even if that innocent body is still within her own body.
You decry Islam, and yet you still seek to keep women down with your supposedly 'God-given' command that women cannot even control their own bodies. Pathetic.
The Instructor
Originally posted by SuzianneYou are listening to the false teachers.
I should have said Radioactive Isotope Dating.
Actually Carbon dating does work on fossils but is inconclusive over 50,000 years, given the half-life of 5700 years for Carbon 14. For anything older than that, they can use Potassium 40 or Uranium 238 or even Thorium 232.
The Instructor
Originally posted by wolfgang59Radioactive Isotope Dating Is Fallible.
Apart from your repulsive stand on abortion ...
why is this false?
You repeatedly talk about C14 dating when scientists don't use it.
You are a MORON
http://www.icr.org/article/its-official-radioactive-isotope-dating/
Why radiometric dating doesn't work
Radioisotope dating
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsAll those sites are devoted to destroying evolution, with an agenda like that you don't give them any credibility and furthermore there so-called arguments have been refuted hundreds of times before but you jump on these asssholes like they were actually promoting science. We BOTH know they are doing no such thing, simply trying to destroy evolution as a science in their insane insistence the world is only 6000 years old.
Radioactive Isotope Dating Is Fallible.
http://www.icr.org/article/its-official-radioactive-isotope-dating/
Why radiometric dating doesn't work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ICcfbqUFZo
Radioisotope dating
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVvGDu9mDuQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u-fvOd3ZnA
The Instructor
That is so patently false there is no need to further refute it. We just let them fulminate in the corner where they will wither and die in time.
Originally posted by sonhouseI see no reason to accept the man-made evil-lution model when the evidence refutes the evil-lution model and supports the God given creation model.
All those sites are devoted to destroying evolution, with an agenda like that you don't give them any credibility and furthermore there so-called arguments have been refuted hundreds of times before but you jump on these asssholes like they were actually promoting science. We BOTH know they are doing no such thing, simply trying to destroy evolution as a sc ...[text shortened]... ther refute it. We just let them fulminate in the corner where they will wither and die in time.
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsUsually it's the JWs with this baloney.
Radioactive Isotope Dating Is Fallible.
http://www.icr.org/article/its-official-radioactive-isotope-dating/
Why radiometric dating doesn't work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ICcfbqUFZo
Radioisotope dating
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVvGDu9mDuQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u-fvOd3ZnA
The Instructor
Are any of these links from the Watchtower org.?
Originally posted by RJHindsYou keep insisting on putting God into your tiny little boxes. Is that so you can feel bigger than God?
I see no reason to accept the man-made evil-lution model when the evidence refutes the evil-lution model and supports the God given creation model.
The Instructor
Sorry, I believe the God-given evolution model. I eschew your magic-wand model.