07 Oct 12
1 edit
okay, so we have a non-magical fruit that bestows magical properties on people who eat it and a talking snake who wasn't.
this keeps getting better and better. 😵
[oddly enough, this dysfunctional reasoning does explain how christians can accept multiple contradictions and failed prophecies; they just redefine things to suit their current dogmas.]
07 Oct 12
Originally posted by VoidSpiritYou seem to have it all figured out and are wise in your own eyes. So have you made plans for your death? Is it going to be a glorious affair? 😏
okay, so we have a non-magical fruit that bestows magical properties on people who eat it and a talking snake who wasn't.
this keeps getting better and better. 😵
[oddly enough, this dysfunctional reasoning does explain how christians can accept multiple contradictions and failed prophecies; they just redefine things to suit their current dogmas.]
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
07 Oct 12
Originally posted by VoidSpiritand the non magical flooding of the earth and the non magical storing and mating of 2 of each animal and the non magical disappearance of the flood water.
okay, so we have a non-magical fruit that bestows magical properties on people who eat it and a talking snake who wasn't.
this keeps getting better and better. 😵
[oddly enough, this dysfunctional reasoning does explain how christians can accept multiple contradictions and failed prophecies; they just redefine things to suit their current dogmas.]
07 Oct 12
Originally posted by stellspalfieIt must be all lies, right? All these things do not make sense to the natural mind. And of course the supernatural or spiritual world has not been proven to exist by modern science. Case closed. 😏
and the non magical flooding of the earth and the non magical storing and mating of 2 of each animal and the non magical disappearance of the flood water.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
07 Oct 12
Originally posted by RJHindslies is a bit strong id say fictional events. id never say case closed, always keep it slightly ajar for the microscopic possibility that christians are correct.
It must be all lies, right? All these things do not make sense to the natural mind. And of course the supernatural or spiritual world has not been proven to exist by modern science. Case closed. 😏
07 Oct 12
Originally posted by stellspalfiewe'll, you would have to believe that water didn't evaporate before the flood. that's one of the fun-facts.
lies is a bit strong id say fictional events. id never say case closed, always keep it slightly ajar for the microscopic possibility that christians are correct.
07 Oct 12
1 edit
Originally posted by VoidSpiritno, you would have to believe that there was a water canopy, you zoobs don't know anything, here you have been caught havering about magic trees, magic apples, talking snakes, it seems that your ignorance of scripture really knows no bounds.
we'll, you would have to believe that water didn't evaporate before the flood. that's one of the fun-facts.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
07 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobiehaha!!! water canopy brilliant. did it cover the whole globe or was it kept in one place?
no, you would have to believe that there was a water canopy, you zoobs don't know anything, here you have been caught havering about magic trees, magic apples, talking snakes, it seems that your ignorance of scripture really knows no bounds.
07 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAh ok...and was this canopy entirely natural too? If so please explain, or link me to some sites explaining the physics of big old water canopies surrounding the earth
no, you would have to believe that there was a water canopy, you zoobs don't know anything, here you have been caught havering about magic trees, magic apples, talking snakes, it seems that your ignorance of scripture really knows no bounds.
07 Oct 12
2 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell it's a bit difficult to do any serious research when you theists can't get your stories straight...Some of you think it never happened, some of you think it happens by magic, some of you think it's within the framework of standard science. Indeed it is far more efficient for person who believes X_n about Y to go ahead and explain X_n, than for us to find a cohesive account of X_n in the set of beliefs {X_1, X_2, ..., X_n, ...} about Y
do you own research and stop being soon fed.
So come on Robbie, spill!