Originally posted by robbie carrobie
your assertions of fairy tales notwithstanding does not negate the awesomeness of the experience Agers, for we are human and we enjoy life in all its diveristy, can the same be said of a midge, lives for a day, procreates and dies, hardly! For we have a consciousness and the ability to communicate that consciousness through ideas and language!
...[text shortened]... ge would be striped away as if your mind were destined to be a broken cup, cannot be recommended
your assertions of fairy tales notwithstanding does not negate the awesomeness of the experience Agers, for we are human and we enjoy life in all its diveristy, can the same be said of a midge, lives for a day, procreates and dies, hardly! For we have a consciousness and the ability to communicate that consciousness through ideas and language!
That conciousness, if I can establish it wouldn't be *me* in whatever shell gives rise to my perception in that "Garden", has no more virtue to me than the lesser conciousness I would have as a fly. I don't want to be God_{whodey} drone 1027382937461, I want to be *me*,
warts and all!
Your assertion that we would be androids deviod of personality is illogical and ignores the evidence, that God wants us to be happy and fulfilled individuals each with our own personality. The idea that our behaviour must be perfect is Calvinistic in nature and belies and attitude that you must be goody goody all the time. Its illogical for clearly perfection is relative, for if it were not, be would play snooker and score a break of 147 every time, we would play flawless chess, which would make life rather dull, and cannot therefore be supported.
Well an illogical conclusion works in my favour if it is deduced validly by assuming some premise X - since, as per proof by contradiction, it then allows me to conclude X is not true.
Since this is my main contention, and my argument is currently with you, I suppose I should work on your terms, and more slowly to establish the conclusion I put forward.[1]
Anyway, to start this off let me ask you a question:
What sins are permissible in (Garden of Eden)_{Robbie Carrobie}?
who cares what Whodey thinks, he knows nothing of Paradise! its all politics to him! therefore my point with regard to our limited time and experience for learning, in opposition to your assertion that knowledge would be striped away as if your mind were destined to be a broken cup, cannot be recommended
A few posts prior to the one where our exchange here took place I conceded it would be ok to live in such a garden for a finite length of time corresponding to roughly the number of years I can expect to live given my current age (albeit with the annoyance at not being *me*)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1) noting that since we're shifting from (Garden of Eden)_{whodey} to (Garden of Eden)_{Robbie Carrobie} whatever results from this discussion may not apply to (Garden of Eden)_{whodey}