And you have no more forgotten what they are than I have forgotten what your views on the matter are.
So you are directly saying I am lying that I have to ask you.
Its hardly a good bluff.
Face it, some things you say are forgettable. Its not like you were Jesus Christ speaking in the Gospels you know?
@sonship saidMy questions to you remain unanswered. They will come up again. I have answered your questions about the origin of the universe countless times. Those answers are the same today as they were a few months ago.
And there is no reason why YOUR self centeredness that you have to have YOUR hoops jumped through first should be a rule here. There's no law that your inquisitions always take precedence.
I am an agnostic atheist. Before that, I was a theist. "Changing" was OK.
You use to say you were a Christian.
Have you revised that now to just say you were once a theist ?
You use to say "I was a Christian."
Of course evidence never seemed to follow the claim other than you had and liked some Christians you knew.
@sonship saidIf you are seriously claiming that you don't recall what my beliefs are about the origin of the universe ~ while I recall what yours are because we have discussed it many times, including 2-3 months ago ~ then, yes, you are lying. I have no doubt about that.
So you are directly saying I am lying that I have to ask you.
@sonship saidI identify as an "agnostic atheist" because that label best sums up my beliefs as they pertain to supernatural phenomena and "revealed" religions.
You're an agnostic atheist so that you can shift back and forth when one or the other belief is shown to be irrational.
@sonship saidBeing "an agnostic atheist" is not being "fearful". It sums up my stance accurately. Please don't talk to me like I am a weakminded or mentally disabled person that you are trying to prey on.I am an agnostic atheist.
Are you fearful of definitely committing to ONE or the OTHER ?
@sonship saidAnd this is why you gave on several occasions accused me of lying about having been a Christian, as has Eladar, KellyJay, RJHinds and Romans1009 to name but four.
Of course evidence never seemed to follow the claim other than you had and liked some Christians you knew.
Please don't talk to me like I am a weakminded or mentally disabled person that you are trying to prey on.
I didn't. I said "What an ego."
Now, while we are on "revealed truth", isn't it that you want us to accept your "revealed truth" about the NT being texturally a fabrication not a reliable biography of Jesus.
You merely implied IE. "I have no methodology to demonstrate that. Just TAKE IT as my revealed truth."
You want me to take a blind leap of faith without doing the word of demonstration - "HERE is the original / HERE is the embellishments added."
You just come with "revealed truth" about something you won't demonstrate you have logical evidence for. Not even in 48 verses of one chapter you couldn't demonstrate. Talking about "revealed truth" to be take on faith.