Originally posted by FMF
Dasa called for genocide, yes. All Muslim men. No exceptions. Some women would be spared. Children would escape with their lives. He even used the word "genocide" on page 2 of the thread, so he knew exactly what his proposal meant. At least 60 fellow posters have seen the thread. Many have come forward to corroborate what I have said. I have even quoted him verb ...[text shortened]... part. So you've drawn yet another blank. What other "lies" do you accuse me of, RJHinds?
In one of your posts you wrote the following about Dasa:
"He said that all Muslim men were to be "eradicated" (his word), even if they
converted to other religions [his actual words were "force must be used and
termination of all Muslims would be the rule. Muslims converting to other
religions at the eleventh hour would not be accepted"], the women "would be
allowed to prove themselves" to him and perhaps spared (his words exactly)..."
I replied with the following:
"This proves that your understanding of what Dasa meant is flawed.
By Dasa's own words it had nothing to do with what religion they were.
So if they are no longer believers in Islam, they would no longer be
Muslim. So what was the reason he believed all of these persons
should be eliminated? He answered that question later when He
called them criminals. What did they do to be termed criminals?
Did you ask Dasa that question?"
You responded with the following:
"Dasa proposed the termination of all Muslim men because they were Muslims,
and perhaps the sparing of some Muslim women, even though they were Muslim."
You never answered my questions and when you used his exact words as you
wrote, the word "genocide" was not there. But now you write he used that
that word when he called for his action. Since you did not answer my
questions, I was not convinced and later replied with the following:
"I still think Dasa meant all the extremist Muslims that are the terrorist
who believe in the Islam that supports Jehad against all infidels, which
they interpret to mean anyone that is not a Muslim. He may not even
know there are other Muslims who do not think this way."
I then believe I copied some information on the definition of "genocide"
to we would be clear of what the term meant. Dasa then replied to me with
the following:
"Thankyou for clearing that up RJHinds.
When I say Muslim men........it goes without saying that I mean violent Muslim men who rape, plunder, bomb, murder and pillage in the name of Allah.
I admit I was not clear about this in my first post....... believing it would be obvious."
But after this you still insist Dasa meant what you think he meant and you
did not misunderstand him in any way. So all I have left to say is read
Dasa's post on Dishonesty and see if you see yourself in some of those
things that makes a person dishonest. If not, then I can not help you.