Originally posted by Proper KnobI guess I must be a very good analyzer or something is wrong with your
Viacheslav Vasilyevich Ragozin was a Soviet GM, he also was the second World Correspondence Chess Champion in 1956-59 thus becoming a GM at that form of the game. The Ragozin Defence line of the Queens Gambit Declined is named after him. Not too shabby a player.
Here are the results of eight games analysed from his 1959 triumph, with two games to stil ...[text shortened]... ICCF World Championship. How does someone with an 1817 OTB rating do that? The floor is yours.
figures. Perhaps, some of his moves were better than the computers,
who can say? But you should be satisfied now for I have promised
everyone I would no longer analyze the games I play on RHP, since
that is upsetting to some players because I am so good at it. 😏
Originally posted by RJHindsBTW that smiley is really annoying...
I guess I must be a very good analyzer or something is wrong with your
figures. Perhaps, some of his moves were better than the computers,
who can say? But you should be satisfied now for I have promised
everyone I would no longer analyze the games I play on RHP, since
that is upsetting to some players because I am so good at it. 😏
just sayin' . Cant you do some other ones from time to time. It just makes you seem so goddam smug, when you put that at the end of nearly every post 😏
1 edit
Originally posted by wolfgang59I do not think Proper Knob's proof is very good, since I have played some
RJH
Of course you do not cheat - so I have but one question;
[b]Why do you not enter the World Correspondance Chess Championships?
We have proof that you play better than them![/b]
of the top players here and have lost. Something does not seem right.
Why do they beat me, if my matchups are so wonderful? Since you guys
do not want me to do any analysis on another board then how could I
possibly win?
Originally posted by RJHindsNo help you lose, help you win.
I do not think Proper Knob's proof is very good, since I have played some
of the top players here and have lost. Something does not seem right.
Why do they beat me, if my matchups are so wonderful? Since you guys
do not want me to do any analysis on another board then how could I
possibly win?
Simple.
Originally posted by RJHindsI can hardly see how you're a better 'analyser' than a GM who won the ICCF World Championship thus becoming a CC GM. Ragozin played 14 games in 3 years, i'll repeat that, 14 GAMES IN THREE YEARS to win the title!!!!! That's about 400-500 moves in three years, you've averaged that many moves PER MONTH since you joined this site, and here you are claiming to be a better anaylser than a correspondence GM world champion. 🙄
I guess I must be a very good analyzer or something is wrong with your
figures. Perhaps, some of his moves were better than the computers,
who can say? But you should be satisfied now for I have promised
everyone I would no longer analyze the games I play on RHP, since
that is upsetting to some players because I am so good at it. 😏
Ron, give it up will you?! You're busted, you have no defence and no one believes a word of what you have to say on the subject. You stop 'analysing' if that's what you want to call it.
Originally posted by RJHindsA strong human player combined with a strong computer [called a 'centaur'] will generally beat a player who is simply accepting an engine's choices without doing any work on his own. Computers suffer from horizon effect [things look good X moves ahead, but after X+1, there is trouble]. A strong human player will recognize this and steer the game away from those bad lines.
I do not think Proper Knob's proof is very good, since I have played some
of the top players here and have lost. Something does not seem right.
Why do they beat me, if my matchups are so wonderful? Since you guys
do not want me to do any analysis on another board then how could I
possibly win?
1 edit
Originally posted by jaywillI lasted three minutes, more meism, its all about me, Jesus in me, my personal
RJHinds,
Before you go, observe the consecration of these young Christians giving testimonmy of the spread of the Lord's recovery.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=BeAxZGGmHPY
salvation, yuk!
1 edit
Originally posted by jaywillIts not unbelief, how could one miss the whole point of the Gospel, that's what i was
I read [b]three and one half words of your reply. More unbelief YUK.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=BeAxZGGmHPY[/b]
wondering. 'we need to give ourselves to the Lord, we need to be Zion', its all about
us, yuk, yuk, yuk, !