Originally posted by EcstremeVenomYes.
i think you get the idea.
For the record, when a poet, such as Borges, writes of a dream, I don't really think he's referring to an actual dream. Rather, the fiction of the dream is a device to claim spiritual authority for the insight while at the same time creating distance and deniability for the assertion. While I doubt the dream, I think his image of heaven and hell seems more credible than most of what I've heard in church.
Originally posted by Wulebgrsome people think it is just emptiness, and dark, i think it was "psychics" who believed that i dont remember. i wonder if it is a bad place at all, and just an alternative of heaven.
Yes.
For the record, when a poet, such as Borges, writes of a dream, I don't really think he's referring to an actual dream. Rather, the fiction of the dream is a device to claim spiritual authority for the insight while at the same time creating distance and deniability for the assertion. While I doubt the dream, I think his image of heaven and hell seems more credible than most of what I've heard in church.
Originally posted by jaywillSomehow I missed this!
Those are a funny kind of believers who didn't know who it was they were treating. They're believing (the sheep) is not in Jesus whom they don't even know.
What they have done to "these" they did to the Lord. But they didn't realize that they were doing it, in either case with the goats or the sheep.
So the people brought before the throne of the Lo ...[text shortened]... r the sheep. They are with the third group - [b]"these, the least of my brothers." [/b]
Your assertion, that Christians are in a third group is utterly unsupported
by this story. Note verses 31-33:
When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him,
he will sit upon his glorious throne, and all the nations will be
assembled before him. And he will separate them one from
another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will
place the hseep on his right and the goats on his left.
In 'all nations' and the dividing, there is no mention of a third group.
The 'least' refers (clearly) to the people in need (the hungry, thirsty,
imprisoned, and so forth). As you are expected to love your enemy,
whether a hungry (or naked, or imprisoned) person is a believer or not
is irrelevant; the true Christian is called to love irrespective of the
beliefs of the person's being loved.
So, unless you interpret 'all nations' to mean 'all nations except
Christians' (in which case, you change the meaning of the term), your
stance doesn't hold water.
Nemesio