Originally posted by jaywillThat is because his heart needs changing as does all the others that believe any kind of sexual act is good and moral.
Any intrusion into the morality of sex is religious control pure and simple just like the religious suppression of women. ( A man is worth 50 shekels, a woman 35).
Where is this 50 shekels verses 35 shekels matter you're all bent out of shape about ?
Female equality is assumed in MANY crucial places in the Old Testament :
...[text shortened]... lectively outraged and seems incapable of considering the bigger picture.
Originally posted by JS357Even if your speculation is correct, there is no proof that God approved of such actions. I can't imagine how anyone could say the male genitals are sweet to the taste unless they have been roasted over an open fire. And is there really any sweet smell that can flow out of the female genitals and fruit in there to eat? If Solomon really meant what you say, he must have taken some drug that altered his senses. It is all nasty and disgusting to me and definitely not what I would call morally normal. I think this is another deception of Satan.
But Christian opinions do vary, and always suspecting an attitude of getting away with things is not necessarily justified. Sincere Christians wanting to enter into a loving marriage may have similar questions.
http://www.christian-marriage-today.com/is-oral-sex-a-sin.html
quote:
Get your Bible and turn to the Song of Songs (Song of Solomon) 2:3 and 4 ese verses, but it is not necessarily the most restrictive reading of scripture that is best.
Originally posted by RJHindsyou must be joking, this has to be a wind-up!!!! ....or you have never been anywhere near a womans vag**a in your life...or maybe you just lay with woman with poor self-hygiene. as you were ex-u.s. army im guessing its the later (and probably at a charge).
Even if your speculation is correct, there is no proof that God approved of such actions. I can't imagine how anyone could say the male genitals are sweet to the taste unless they have been roasted over an open fire. And is there really any sweet smell that can flow out of the female genitals and fruit in there to eat? If Solomon really meant what you say ...[text shortened]... d definitely not what I would call morally normal. I think this is another deception of Satan.
as for the taste of a p***s, try sticking your thumb in your mouth, its pretty much made if the same thing (skin).
Originally posted by RJHindsIt's not my speculation, it's from the Christian marriage advisory website that I cited.
Even if your speculation is correct, there is no proof that God approved of such actions. I can't imagine how anyone could say the male genitals are sweet to the taste unless they have been roasted over an open fire. And is there really any sweet smell that can flow out of the female genitals and fruit in there to eat? If Solomon really meant what you say ...[text shortened]... d definitely not what I would call morally normal. I think this is another deception of Satan.
Edit: I will add that the site says, "Remember, sex in Christian marriage is not selfish. So at no time should you require your spouse to perform sexual acts merely for your satisfaction if it makes them uncomfortable. "
Originally posted by JS357well i think youve just about put this debate to bed. good work. christians of the world can get back down to happy business of orally pleasuring their partners.
It's not my speculation, it's from the Christian marriage advisory website that I cited.
Edit: I will add that the site says, "Remember, sex in Christian marriage is not selfish. So at no time should you require your spouse to perform sexual acts merely for your satisfaction if it makes them uncomfortable. "
lets all take a moment to bow our heads and spare a thought for mrs carrobie and hinds. may their unloved labias and unlicked lips, oral drought come to an end soon.
Originally posted by JS357My conscience prevents me from condoning all oral sexual acts as morally right within a marriage, regardless of what someone on a Christian marriage advisory website might say.
It's not my speculation, it's from the Christian marriage advisory website that I cited.
Edit: I will add that the site says, "Remember, sex in Christian marriage is not selfish. So at no time should you require your spouse to perform sexual acts merely for your satisfaction if it makes them uncomfortable. "
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
Originally posted by RJHindsActually that would be consensual sex between two people whatever the orientation. I do not believe all sex acts are moral. If I saw a man raping a 6 yo, I would be in there with a 2X4 beating the SOB to death if I could. I am talking about consensual sex between adults. I want to hear NOBODY tell me about morality and all that BS by religious nutters trying to control my life.
That is because his heart needs changing as does all the others that believe any kind of sexual act is good and moral.
You are part of the problem, not the solution.
Originally posted by sonhouseI am not trying to control your life. I am stating my opinion on the subject. I know there are many people that do not believe as I do. I just think my belief is more like what God wants in the marriage relationship of a man and woman.
Actually that would be consensual sex between two people whatever the orientation. I do not believe all sex acts are moral. If I saw a man raping a 6 yo, I would be in there with a 2X4 beating the SOB to death if I could. I am talking about consensual sex between adults. I want to hear NOBODY tell me about morality and all that BS by religious nutters trying to control my life.
You are part of the problem, not the solution.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
Originally posted by RJHindsdo you really think vaginas taste bad?
I am not trying to control your life. I am stating my opinion on the subject. I know there are many people that do not believe as I do. I just think my belief is more like what God wants in the marriage relationship of a man and woman.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
1 edit
What we have seen here is a couple of religionists taking their own personal preferences and - perhaps - psychological circumstances [in terms of their own personal sexuality] - and attempting to denounce and proscribe the practices they dislike by wrapping them up in the language of morality, holy scripture and a clumsily appropriated (and unsubstantiated) mandate form "God". It's the way of the world, I suppose. There are tinpot pontificators claiming divine inspiration all over the place. Faintly disgraceful, I reckon. But relatively harmless too.