Originally posted by FMFYes i could produce not a few Biblical principles with which to substantiate my case that
Do you have a quote that back up your claim? What other marital sex acts do you disapprove of for being not "a religious norm"?
oral sex is not the religious norm, do you have any to the contrary? Sodomy for one,
clearly the anus is not designed for sexual intercourse, or perhaps you have
physiological evidence to the contrary?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut as we have seen from your bodged attempt to substantiate the claim by way of a dictionary definition, marital oral sex is not condemned by your religions' literature. In fact, sex within marriage is condoned and encouraged and entirely moral.
I have Biblical principles which I have weighed in the balance.
Originally posted by FMFactually it is, you dont know what you are talking about, i'd call that botch of the century.
But as we have seen from your bodged attempt to substantiate the claim by way of a dictionary definition, marital oral sex is not condemned by your religions' literature. In fact, sex within marriage is condoned and encouraged and entirely moral.
Originally posted by FMFexplicit, who stated that its explicit Mr strawberry straw man? I stated that i have
It's your claim. Where is the explicit condemnation of oral sex within marriage?
principles which i have weighed in the balance, where are your principles to the contrary
or are we simply expected to take your opinion as having intrinsic value once again,
Pontifex Maximus ?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou are declaring marital oral sex to be "immoral", unilaterally? or do you mean you personally don't want to do it for personal reasons, rather like RJHinds?
explicit, who stated that its explicit Mr strawberry straw man? I stated that i have
principles which i have weighed in the balance, where are your principles to the contrary
or are we simply expected to take your opinion as having intrinsic value once again,
Pontifex Maximus ?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOral sex does not harm anyone; it does not involve coercion; it does not involve deception; it has no victim. I think my stance is principled.
where are your principles to the contrary or are we simply expected to take your opinion as having intrinsic value once again [?]
Originally posted by FMFon the basis of religious principles and the dictionary quotation was adequate enough to
Yes, but on what basis? That dictionary quote which missed the target completely?
state that pornia in the Biblical context has a much broader understanding than is
immediately apparent, i suspect this subtlety went unnoticed by you as you attempted
to hide behind the technicality of extra marital affairs.