Originally posted by stellspalfieIt also spends zero time discussing killing people with a hand gun, yet the principles are
clamber down off your little stool, take the battered mars bar out of your mouth, quit the pontificating jock boy and admit that its odd that the bible spends a huge (in comparison) amount of time discussing the evils of homosexuality directly and zero time on pedophilia.
answer a straight question with a straight answer -
if you could rid the world of homosexuality or pedophilia which one would you go for?
there for the discerning to note that clearly, it is quite wrong.
If it was up to me, id rid the world of homosexual paedophiles by literal castration.
07 Aug 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobiethats probably because it was written by a man that didnt know guns would exist.
It also spends zero time discussing killing people with a hand gun, yet the principles are
there for the discerning to note that clearly, it is quite wrong.
If it was up to me, id rid the world of homosexual paedophiles by literal castration.
you didnt answer the question straight robbie!! what you wrote though suggests you put homosexual pedophilia over hetrosexual pedophilia...............very strange and quite possibly the most epic fail of all time. get to the back of the class and write me fifty lines on why child abuse is just as bad for girls as it is boys.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat about heterosexual paedophiles?
It also spends zero time discussing killing people with a hand gun, yet the principles are
there for the discerning to note that clearly, it is quite wrong.
If it was up to me, id rid the world of homosexual paedophiles by literal castration.
Originally posted by stellspalfiethen perhaps paedophilia was unknown to the Biblical authors also.
thats probably because it was written by a man that didnt know guns would exist.
you didnt answer the question straight robbie!! what you wrote though suggests you put homosexual pedophilia over hetrosexual pedophilia...............very strange and quite possibly the most[b] epic fail of all time. get to the back of the class and write me fifty lines on why child abuse is just as bad for girls as it is boys.[/b]
Originally posted by RJHindsso do blowjobs count as immoral?
"But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, [b]the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death."
(Revelation 21:8 NKJV)
I think those sexually abusing children is included with the sexually immoral.[/b]
Originally posted by stellspalfiedoes the Bible really not mention paedophilia?
thats probably because it was written by a man that didnt know guns would exist.
you didnt answer the question straight robbie!! what you wrote though suggests you put homosexual pedophilia over hetrosexual pedophilia...............very strange and quite possibly the most[b] epic fail of all time. get to the back of the class and write me fifty lines on why child abuse is just as bad for girls as it is boys.[/b]
The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology states, for example, that
porneia means “unchastity, harlotry, prostitution, fornication.” It also says: “The
word-group [involving porneia] can describe various extra-marital sexual modes of
behaviour insofar as they deviate from accepted social and religious norms (e.g.
homosexuality, promiscuity, paedophilia [sexual abuse of children], and especially
prostitution).” Thus, porneia would include adultery (Greek, moikheia), and can cover a
broader range of other immoral practices outside marriage, such as oral or anal sex
and bestiality.