02 Sep '06 21:20>
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomWhy not?
this isnt algebra
Originally posted by PawnokeyholeEternity is timeless. There is no time in eternity to repent. When we die our souls leave our body, and in that very condition that it is in you will be judged.
Stating that God arranged matters thus does is not the same as stating a moral reason for why he arranged matter thus.
Please make an effort to think of a moral reason God might have had for making it impossible for a soul to repent after death.
Originally posted by dj2beckerYou still haven't answered my question. Why are you being so deliberately uncooperative?
Eternity is timeless. There is no time in eternity to repent. When we die our souls leave our body, and in that very condition that it is in you will be judged.
I suggest you take a look at this website: www.insightofgod.com
Originally posted by PawnokeyholeA person has to accept the forgiveness in order to escape the punishment.
Yes it does. The point holds for all non-nonsensical X, Y, and Z.
If you don't think so, give me one counterexample of a person forgiving someone for doing something and then going on to punish them for doing something.
Anybody who claims that this is possible is similarly not familiar with the everyday meaning of the words "forgive" and "punish".
Originally posted by dj2beckerWho were your mentors and inspirations concerning your faith? I'm curious.
A person has to accept the forgiveness in order to escape the punishment.
Likewise God will forgive you if you accept his forgiveness, but punish you if you reject his forgiveness.
I don't see what is so difficult to understand about this.
Originally posted by dj2beckerThat's very odd behavior on God's part.
A person has to accept the forgiveness in order to escape the punishment.
Likewise God will forgive you if you accept his forgiveness, but punish you if you reject his forgiveness.
I don't see what is so difficult to understand about this.
Originally posted by PawnokeyholeYou still haven't answered my question. Why are you being so deliberately uncooperative?
You still haven't answered my question. Why are you being so deliberately uncooperative?
Also, eternity is not timeless. To the contrary: it consists of everlasting time. Hence, there is infinite time in eternity to repent.
Note that, if eternity were really timeless, nothing would happen, because things happen over time.
Originally posted by dj2beckerWhich, if either, of these statements, do you regard as true:
[b]You still haven't answered my question. Why are you being so deliberately uncooperative?
I thought I did as best I could. Did I miss something?
Also, eternity is not timeless. To the contrary: it consists of everlasting time. Hence, there is infinite time in eternity to repent.
I believe that time in eternity is totally different to ...[text shortened]... ternity. And thus after death it is impossible for the condition of the soul to change.[/b]
Originally posted by dj2beckerWhy do you believe in this barely coherent notion of time? Because you like to believe in it, or because there is some strong reason to?
[b]You still haven't answered my question. Why are you being so deliberately uncooperative?
I thought I did as best I could. Did I miss something?
Also, eternity is not timeless. To the contrary: it consists of everlasting time. Hence, there is infinite time in eternity to repent.
I believe that time in eternity is totally different to ...[text shortened]... ternity. And thus after death it is impossible for the condition of the soul to change.[/b]
Originally posted by PawnokeyholeI think you have the wrong end of the stick here...
That's very odd behavior on God's part.
If person A forgives person B for doing something wrong, person B don't need to accept that foregiveness in order for person A not to punish them. In virtue of the fact that person A has forgiven them, person A will not punish person B. Person B's acceptance is neither here nor there.
I really think you fun ...[text shortened]... ssible for a person A who forgives person B for doing X to then punish person B for doing X.
Originally posted by dj2beckerThere is nothing vague or obscure about the terms I am using. This is exasperating.
I think you have the wrong end of the stick here...
Please define your terms clearly, so that I can understand what you mean, e.g. X=God; Y=Christ; Z= Mankind.
Originally posted by dj2beckerQuote Pawnokeyhole: "I don't think X can forgive Y for doing Z and then punish Y for doing Z." I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. Obviously, X and Y are intelligent life forms, and Z is an act which in X's eyes is wrong. In case of God sending people to hell, X is God, Y is a person, and Z is a sin.
I think you have the wrong end of the stick here...
Please define your terms clearly, so that I can understand what you mean, e.g. X=God; Y=Christ; Z= Mankind.
Originally posted by NordlysYou worked all that complex reasoning out on your own?
Quote Pawnokeyhole: "I don't think X can forgive Y for doing Z and then punish Y for doing Z." I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. Obviously, X and Y are intelligent life forms, and Z is an act which in X's eyes is wrong. In case of God sending people to hell, X is God, Y is a person, and Z is a sin.
Originally posted by PawnokeyholeFalse on both counts. I think it is a lot more complicated than that.
Which, if either, of these statements, do you regard as true:
A: Is God punishing people, by putting them in hell against their will?
(T/F)
B: Are people punishing themselves, by putting themselves voluntarily in hell?
(T/F)