1 edit
Originally posted by @sonhouseThe 66 books started with creation, went right into God interacting with man, the begets
Or not. Why would a god say one thing to one generation of humans and another to a bunch a thousand years later. That appears to be the timeline of the two 7 day creation stories, Egyptian one a thousand years before the first books of the OT.
take us from Adam to Jesus. There isn't any other "creation" story like those 66 books,
I'd rethink your comparison.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThat you ask that question reveals a huge gap in your knowledge and understanding, way too big for an arbitrary post to resolve.
What was borrowed exactly?
Jesus wasn't the first demi-god, for example. Mary didn't give us our first virgin birth. And on and on and on. I understand that your camp is proud of the blinders you wear.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI don't presume so; and yes.
So my view isn't reasonable and neither is any other view? What about your view, is your view reasonable to you? Whatever it may be.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerHere and now. I don't understand much, but I get the boundaries.
What then does make sense to you? Nothing?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @apathistYou don't know it was borrowed. You are merely making an unfounded assertion.
That you ask that question reveals a huge gap in your knowledge and understanding, way too big for an arbitrary post to resolve.
Jesus wasn't the first demi-god, for example. Mary didn't give us our first virgin birth. And on and on and on. I understand that your camp is proud of the blinders you wear.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerOr possibly he's the only one out of the two of you who has done his research.
You don't know it was borrowed. You are merely making an unfounded assertion.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeResearch which he somehow cannot get himself to share. Yeah right.
Or possibly he's the only one out of the two of you who has done his research.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeIf he really has done his research he would have no problem telling me how he knows it was borrowed. Still waiting.
Or possibly he's the only one out of the two of you who has done his research.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo we really need to food spoon you your own religion?
If he really has done his research he would have no problem telling me how he knows it was borrowed. Still waiting.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeNo all you have to do is back up your assertions else I won't take them seriously.
Do we really need to food spoon you your own religion?
3 edits
Originally posted by @apathistJesus wasn't the first demi-god, for example. Mary didn't give us our first virgin birth. And on and on and on. I understand that your camp is proud of the blinders you wear.
That you ask that question reveals a huge gap in your knowledge and understanding, way too big for an arbitrary post to resolve.
Jesus wasn't the first demi-god, for example. Mary didn't give us our first virgin birth. And on and on and on. I understand that your camp is proud of the blinders you wear.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you mean "And on and on" with your debunked Zeitgeist ?
Originally posted by @sonshipThe real arrogance is humans thinking they are high enough up the spiritual totem pole to be worthy of the attention of a god inspite of the fact men have killed literally hundreds of millions of fellow humans.
[b]Jesus wasn't the first demi-god, for example. Mary didn't give us our first virgin birth. And on and on and on. I understand that your camp is proud of the blinders you wear.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you mean "And on and on" with your debunked Zeitgeist ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFI6m6Icav4[/b]
You just love to separate humans into us and them so you can continue to feel so superior.