Originally posted by stellspalfieThis is the same guy who recently tried to claim that he forgot whether he believed Santa existed or not.
[b]"contained in those reasons was, i repeat was a reference to adoption and issues which were raised by gay adoption"
go back and read your own post. the word adoption is not mentioned once, not once!!! the actual effects of gay parents on a child is not mentioned once!!!! not once!!!!! irrational or stupid, it could be either, but this is why d ...[text shortened]... re not 'okay upstairs' and i shouldnt be taking the 'p' out of you or encouraging you.[/b]
Originally posted by Proper KnobI agree with you, a man is a man and a woman is a woman. Neither should be discriminated. But the act of homosexuality is unnatural, ungodly, and just plain wrong. it is a sick society that condones it.
I believe that people shouldn't be discriminated on the basis of their sexuality. Call it what you like, it makes no difference to me, but that is my stand.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by checkbaitercan you define what god means by 'unnatural'?
I agree with you, a man is a man and a woman is a woman. Neither should be discriminated. But the act of homosexuality is unnatural, ungodly, and just plain wrong. it is a sick society that condones it.
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper Knobso its a moral stance, thank you, you have essentially admitted what stellspalfie could not bring himself to do. Why is known only to him.
I believe that people shouldn't be discriminated on the basis of their sexuality. Call it what you like, it makes no difference to me, but that is my stand.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by checkbaiteryes sir. to help you out a bit, i will be expecting you to be able to define what and what is not natural in the world based upon gods definition of natural/unnatural. i really,really hope you can prove me wrong (by that i mean im expecting you to fail miserably).
Really?
1 edit
Originally posted by ZahlanziAnother epic fail. Homosexual animal myth.
to help you out a bit, there are numerous examples of gayism in the animal world.
did satan tempt the chimps too in abandoning god's will and engage in abominable acts thus ending up in hell? is satan after the souls of the chimps too?
http://narth.com/docs/animalmyth.html
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by robbie carrobiethe epic fail is yours im afraid for posting that pile of crap as evidence for anything. go and find some proper research by a scientist rather than religious right nut cases.....blimey, at least the last paper you linked was an actual attempt at scientific research (albeit a failed one).
Another epic fail. Homosexual animal myth.
http://narth.com/docs/animalmyth.html
2 edits
Originally posted by stellspalfieonce again i have produced evidence, you, the usual bitter and contorted caustic diatribe of a man devoid of reason. Its almost obligatory now for you to dismiss reasons with mere unsubstantiated opinion rather than address the points that were being made. In the original sense of the word, its most pathetic, how very very sad. I weep for you.
the epic fail is yours im afraid for posting that pile of crap as evidence for anything. go and find some proper research by a scientist rather than religious right nut cases.....blimey, at least the last paper you linked was an actual attempt at scientific research (albeit a failed one).
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by robbie carrobieevidence? cut you cut and paste the lines you think are evidence rather than opinion?
once again i have produced evidence, you, the usual bitter and contorted caustic diatribe of a man devoid of reason. Its almost obligatory now for you to dismiss reasons with mere unsubstantiated opinion rather than address the points that were being made. In the original sense of the word, its most pathetic, how very very sad. I weep for you.
did you know you are supposed to do a critical analysis of a paper before you cite it as evidence for anything? did you do a critical analysis?
for example, how qualified is the author? is the author unbiased and objective? those kinda things are a good place to start?
so how did you decide that this guys opinion is worth listening to?
did you research any papers with opposing views so you could look at all the evidence before forming an opinion? which other papers did you look at?
if you want to be scientific and empirical then lets do it properly robbie, you do know how to dont you?
1 edit
Originally posted by stellspalfieStill not a single reference to a single letter of the actual content, another FAIL. Sigh, i should be used to it by now.
evidence? cut you cut and paste the lines you think are evidence rather than opinion?
did you know you are supposed to do a critical analysis of a paper before you cite it as evidence for anything? did you do a critical analysis?
for example, how qualified is the author? is the author unbiased and objective? those kinda things are a good place to ...[text shortened]... ant to be scientific and empirical then lets do it properly robbie, you do know how to dont you?
1 edit
let us take, the first assertions and we shall ask you some questions shall we?
do you believe that,
1.Homosexuality is genetic or innate;
2.Homosexuality is irreversible;
3.Since animals engage in same-sex sexual behavior, homosexuality is natural.
a yes or no answer shall suffice.