Indian triumph

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If someone wrote it in wikipedia it must be true... Do you have any references to scientific journals?

https://www.newsweek.com/gay-dolphins-australia-homosexual-behavior-645360

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150206-are-there-any-homosexual-animals

Or read this:
Homosexual Behaviour in Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective

Originally posted by @secondson
You are deflecting.

You lost this debate just as you did the one you are now resurrecting.

All you're doing is cherry picking three verses out of context to support you dogmatic and narrow minded perspective without regard for both the context of the chapter in question and the cultural history of the era.

Your arguments are as bogus as you are.

You lost this debate just as you did the one you are now resurrecting.

Like many Christians, you seem to think that things are true just because you believe them. You make vacuous assertions that cannot prove.

All you're doing is cherry picking three verses out of context to support you dogmatic and narrow minded perspective without regard for both the context of the chapter in question and the cultural history of the era.

Here's a chance to prove me wrong:
1) By all means, formulate a cogent argument that details exactly how verses surrounding Leviticus 25:44-46 indicate that I took them out of context to change the meaning.
2) By all means, formulate a cogent argument that details exactly how the cultural history of the era changes the meaning of Leviticus 25:44-46.

The fact remains that fact that God clearly, explicitly and unambiguously condoned chattel slavery in Leviticus 25:44-46.

Your assertion that you do not use the Bible to create a morality based on your own selfish interpretations and definitions of it is false and your denial of what Leviticus 25:44-46 proves it. You believe chattel slavery is wrong but deny what God clearly states there.

-Removed-

And the question you've been dodging is this one:

If there is not an objective standard for what is moral and what is immoral, how could anyone be immoral?

-Removed-

Philo asked you the question.

You can use the word 'sinful' instead then. Is 'sin' relative as well?

-Removed-

Try occasionally reading the Bible without your “I’ve got it all right” hat on.

Oh the irony. Don't you have your "I've got it all right" hat on? So you're saying it is not always a sin if you know the good you ought to do and don't do it? 🙄 Or is that true for everyone?

-Removed-

I reckon if you actually answer the question he asked you first he might answer yours.

-Removed-

Does the book of James apply only to believers? If you were a non-believer do you think it wouldn't apply to you?