You accuse conservatives of having sexual ethics because of sexual hang ups.
I sarcastically accuse you of having no sexual ethics because you're a pervert.
Not because X is true, so Y is true, but because X is absurd just as Y is a bit absurd.
And i had heard that Block M area has the bars with the street grills that give handies in the area
I wouldn't know.
Not my thing.
And not an Indonesian.
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @fmfHumanity was also increasing tolerant of gays in the seventh and nineteenth centuries, during the late Sing Dynasty, and during the late Shilla Dynasty...
I don't know about lions and chimpanzees and homosexuality, but humans are increasingly more tolerant of the significant minority among us who are homosexual and seeing homosexual sex as being immoral, in and of itself. I welcome this. You and dj2becker can witter on about the animal kingdom all you want, it doesn't affect the morality of homosexuality in humans.
Idk, man, your basic talking points about progress are historically illiterate and yucky.
Go bone up. Get stronk and come do some real arguments.
FMF: robbie carrobie was another one who wrapped up his sexual hang-ups and inhibitions in pretentious blather about supernatural stuff.robbie carrobie was one of the biggest creeps ever to populate this forum. He used to defend the covering up of child sex abuse by his religious organization, and he used to argue ~ using the Bible ~ that men had the right to rape their wives ~ according to the definition of rape that you and I would use. Conversations with him here on this forum often revealed his hang-ups about sex - even within marriage - which he invariably tried to disguise with beyond-parody pompous "Biblical" drivel.
Originally posted by @philokalia
What a way to live.
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaWell, I accept that you personally don't find homosexuality "proper" or "acceptable", but I welcome our current times in which people with your perspective are less and less able to ensure that there is institutionalized discrimination against homosexuals.
Idk, man, your basic talking points about progress are historically illiterate and yucky.
I welcome the new norms that are taking shape with regard to homosexuals because I don't see their relationships as being immoral.
If a homosexual relationship is loving, if there is no deceit, if there is no hurt or harm, if there is no endangering negligence, if promises are kept, if there is no coercion, and if there is informed consent, then I do not see how it is anything but morally sound.
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaBe that as it may, but the C21st is - in most parts of the world - clearly the best time ever for homosexuals to be open and relaxed about their sexuality. This I see as progress, though I understand fully why you don't.
Humanity was also increasing tolerant of gays in the seventh and nineteenth centuries, during the late Sing Dynasty, and during the late Shilla Dynasty.
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaYou are mistaken. I was talking specifically about a RHP poster called robbie carrobie. I think he was, at heart, a socialist (albeit a supposed Trump supporter when he was trolling the Debates Forum) - although his JW membership precluded him from taking any genuine political stance.
You accuse conservatives of having sexual ethics because of sexual hang ups.
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaI think my "sexual ethics" are just fine.
I sarcastically accuse you of having no sexual ethics because you're a pervert.
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaSo?
And I had heard that Block M area has the bars with the street girls that give handjobs in the area
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaIs this you still talking about robbie carrobie?
Not because X is true, so Y is true, but because X is absurd just as Y is a bit absurd.
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaWhere am I supposed to have made this accusation?
You accuse conservatives of having sexual ethics because of sexual hang ups.
You're just making this up.
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerdolphins
Shifting the burden of proof already? Find a mammal specie apart from humans that does.
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @wolfgang59I see no mention of dolphins here:
dolphins
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_therapy
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @fmfMore chance of converting them to sharks.
I see no mention of dolphins here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_therapy
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @wolfgang59If someone wrote it in wikipedia it must be true... Do you have any references to scientific journals?
dolphins
10 Sep 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerOh yes .. in my back pocket where I carry all my scientific journals..
If someone wrote it in wikipedia it must be true... Do you have any references to scientific journals?