09 May '08 13:18>
Originally posted by KellyJaySo you have shown that cars and life share some properties. But you do not explain why those properties are indicative of design. If it was a known fact that they were then you would not have needed the car example in the first place. In fact if life is not designed then it proves that those properties are not sufficient to indicate design.
Yes, look at the parts and how they are put together and work
together doing different things, but these things combined get
the car functioning as a means of transportation. Look at life it
too has various systems and they do different things, but working
together to get if functioning. Look at the car it has temperature
regulation on some of its part ...[text shortened]... uch more complex manner it does too
and the list goes on and can go on if you want more.
Kelly
So, pick one of those properties and explain why it is indicative of design.