22 Apr 08
Originally posted by sonhouseKJ is the ultimate sidestepper! Give it a few weeks and he will start to regurgitate the crap from the expelled movie.
I said much the same thing as you a few posts back, and he goes:
"You should read all the posts before you respond'. Did you see that one"? Talk about sidestepping the issue.
He is a typical fundamentalist, opinions having been formed with only a small portion of the knowledge, whilst simultaneously being too lazy to further his understanding of the subject.
22 Apr 08
1 edit
Originally posted by timebombtedI think it goes beyond that. I think he is scienfobic, afraid of any evidence his so-called god is anything but a fraud and the worlds biggest scam. I think he fears that more than anything else.
KJ is the ultimate sidestepper! Give it a few weeks and he will start to regurgitate the crap from the expelled movie.
He is a typical fundamentalist, opinions having been formed with only a small portion of the knowledge, whilst simultaneously being too lazy to further his understanding of the subject.
Speaking of Expelled, I am suprised Ben Stein would lend his talents to such a drivel ridden piece of crap movie, trying to be the Michael Moore of the religious right. Shameful exhibition from a supposedly brilliant man.
24 Apr 08
Originally posted by timebombtedWhy don't you spend more time worrying about the topic than me?
KJ is the ultimate sidestepper! Give it a few weeks and he will start to regurgitate the crap from the expelled movie.
He is a typical fundamentalist, opinions having been formed with only a small portion of the knowledge, whilst simultaneously being too lazy to further his understanding of the subject.
Have I ever treated you the way you have me here?
Kelly
24 Apr 08
Originally posted by sonhouseStick to the topic will you, running me down is not the issue.
I think it goes beyond that. I think he is scienfobic, afraid of any evidence his so-called god is anything but a fraud and the worlds biggest scam. I think he fears that more than anything else.
Speaking of Expelled, I am suprised Ben Stein would lend his talents to such a drivel ridden piece of crap movie, trying to be the Michael Moore of the religious right. Shameful exhibition from a supposedly brilliant man.
Kelly
24 Apr 08
1 edit
Originally posted by PalynkaID does not belong in Spirituality, it does not suggest God, gods just
Take it to Spirituality, spanky.
because ID might be real, as was pointed out many life forms can
make things. Simply because life here might require direction with all
the things that are required to occur that does not mean it was God,
but it would mean it wasn't done without a plan, purpose, or design. If
you suggest you cannot have ID without a creator and any thought or
theory that suggests otherwise is not science you have a real limited
view of what could be real. We do not think of God or gods when we
see an ant hill we know ants built it, we do not think of God or gods
when we see a birds nest we know birds built it, life is more complex
and to dismiss out of hand a possible cause because you have a
dislike for what it "could mean in your eyes" is foolish.
Kelly
24 Apr 08
Originally posted by KellyJayID wasn't dismissed out of hand. It is currently dismissed because there is no evidence towards it.
ID does not belong in Spirituality, it does not suggest God, gods just
because ID might be real, as was pointed out many life forms can
make things. Simply because life here might require direction with all
the things that are required to occur that does not mean it was God,
but it would mean it wasn't done without a plan, purpose, or design. If
you su ...[text shortened]... le cause because you have a
dislike for what it "could mean in your eyes" is foolish.
Kelly
24 Apr 08
Originally posted by KellyJayIf Intelligent design doesn't imply a god (or similar type being) then whose intelligence are you supposing was involved?
ID does not belong in Spirituality, it does not suggest God, gods just
because ID might be real, as was pointed out many life forms can
make things. Simply because life here might require direction with all
the things that are required to occur that does not mean it was God,
but it would mean it wasn't done without a plan, purpose, or design. If
you su ...[text shortened]... le cause because you have a
dislike for what it "could mean in your eyes" is foolish.
Kelly
Spirituality doesn't necessarily imply a god per se either.
Just because something is hypothetically possible doesn't mean it's science either.
24 Apr 08
Originally posted by PsychoPawnThe answer is "unknown"--ID doesn't clain to know what kind of intelligence did the "designing"--THAT is what science is all about: questioning and exploring new ideas.
If Intelligent design doesn't imply a god (or similar type being) then whose intelligence are you supposing was involved?
Spirituality doesn't necessarily imply a god per se either.
Just because something is hypothetically possible doesn't mean it's science either.
24 Apr 08
Originally posted by PinkFloydI see no big push to question who the 'IDer' is by the designers of this 'science'. If they were that interested, they would have worldwide debates on the issue, at least discussions. There are no such discussions, instead waving a flag of mystery about it. What do you call that? Hmm, lets see, oh maybe....... COVERUP? OBFUSCATION?
The answer is "unknown"--ID doesn't clain to know what kind of intelligence did the "designing"--THAT is what science is all about: questioning and exploring new ideas.