Is poor good and rich bad?

Is poor good and rich bad?

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
157807
30 May 11

Just asking
Kelly

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
16951
30 May 11

no.

is poor bad and rich good?

no.

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
250510
30 May 11

Originally posted by KellyJay
Just asking
Kelly
You need to define the terms 'bad' and 'good'.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
30 May 11

Originally posted by Rajk999
You need to define the terms 'bad' and 'good'.
If you are speaking of material wealth in todays world,
I would guess that it is probably better to be rich than poor.
However, I don't think good and bad is determined by wealth
or lack of it. I must leave that up to God to decide.

ka
The Axe man

Brisbane,QLD

Joined
11 Apr 09
Moves
102879
30 May 11

I'm a poor guy in a rich country. If I was in a poor country I would be rich.
Having busked the streets of Australia and Europe for the past nearly 20 years I can definately tell you 'poor' people give you more money.

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
116952
30 May 11

'Wealth' should not be measured by the amount of capital or cash one has.

s

England

Joined
15 Nov 03
Moves
33497
30 May 11
1 edit

many rich are good and many poor are bad. its nothing to do with wealth, you wont take it with you, but what you do take with you pray that is rich

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
30 May 11

Originally posted by KellyJay
Just asking
Kelly
Poor and rich are relative terms. In order for one to be rich, others must be poor. Both are bad in their own way. Eliminating the social conditions which breed inequality, so that there are no rich and no poor - that is what is at the heart of being 'good.'

j

Joined
02 Aug 06
Moves
12622
30 May 11

Originally posted by KellyJay
Just asking
Kelly
The very existence of money is itself abnormal.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
157807
30 May 11

Originally posted by rwingett
Poor and rich are relative terms. In order for one to be rich, others must be poor. Both are bad in their own way. Eliminating the social conditions which breed inequality, so that there are no rich and no poor - that is what is at the heart of being 'good.'
I disagree, I think being content with what you have is the greater good. Some
cannot handle riches, some cannot handle being poor, but people find
themselves in both states.
Kelly

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
30 May 11

Originally posted by KellyJay
I disagree, I think being content with what you have is the greater good. Some
cannot handle riches, some cannot handle being poor, but people find
themselves in both states.
Kelly
That is true up to a point. One should content enough with what they have so as not to aspire toward riches. But one should never be content with being destitute while others wallow in opulence. At that point, "being content with what you have" is just a platitude that the rich tell to the poor in order to keep them in place. It becomes nothing more than a slogan designed to help solidify existing inequalities. And those who help perpetuate an unjust world are doing the work of evil.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
30 May 11

Originally posted by karoly aczel
I'm a poor guy in a rich country. If I was in a poor country I would be rich.
Having busked the streets of Australia and Europe for the past nearly 20 years I can definately tell you 'poor' people give you more money.
That is because many of the rich are greedy.

T

Joined
15 Oct 06
Moves
10115
30 May 11

Originally posted by KellyJay
I disagree, I think being content with what you have is the greater good. Some
cannot handle riches, some cannot handle being poor, but people find
themselves in both states.
Kelly
I disagree, I think being content with what you have is the greater good.

Do you believe that an individual who is content in being rich while others are destitute truly good? After all, he IS content with what he has.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
157807
30 May 11

Originally posted by rwingett
That is true up to a point. One should content enough with what they have so as not to aspire toward riches. But one should never be content with being destitute while others wallow in opulence. At that point, "being content with what you have" is just a platitude that the rich tell to the poor in order to keep them in place. It becomes nothing more than a ...[text shortened]... isting inequalities. And those who help perpetuate an unjust world are doing the work of evil.
I agree that not having enough to live on one should and strive for more,
I disagree that having to much is bad just because one has more, because
one can do more with it makes it a useful tool. If one squanders wealth upon
one's self it is just as bad as not having enough, because there is more one can
or could do with it. I doubt very seriously the rich conspire to keep the poor,
poor just because they don't want the poor to have anything. I do believe
that there are those that want the power to control the poor, and keeping
them that way keeps them powerlessly dependent.
Kelly

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
157807
30 May 11
1 edit

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
[b]I disagree, I think being content with what you have is the greater good.

Do you believe that an individual who is content in being rich while others are destitute truly good? After all, he IS content with what he has.[/b]
I don't think your wealth or lack there of adds to or takes away from being
good or bad! I think what you do with what you have defines that. No matter
what income level you are at people can always help those that need it, those
that have more can do more, that is simple math. There are some poor no
matter how much you give them they will remain poor, and there are some
that give great wealth away that will remain rich, because what they do is
done wisely.
Kelly