Last days?

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Read it carefully. 'Based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.'

Again, take some time to understand the difference between a scientific theory and a general theory that Elvis is alive and well and living in Bradford.

Okay, Memphis, I could believe. But Bradford?

@galveston75 said
Really? So a fact is the same as a theory in your mind?

Theory Definition & Meaning | Britannica Dictionary
www.britannica.com/dictionary/theory
"THEORY meaning: 1 : an idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain facts or events; 2 : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true."

I see nothing here that ...[text shortened]... e themselves to a God or just are intent on doing your own thing because you have no clue who he is?

"an idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain facts or events"

What about this do you not understand?

As such, this is why experiments are performed.

@KellyJay said
You assume a lot.

You don't assume enough.

Because of this, your faith is incomplete.

Accepting conspiracy theories over facts is not the sign of a healthy person.

@Suzianne said
You don't assume enough.

Because of this, your faith is incomplete.

Accepting conspiracy theories over facts is not the sign of a healthy person.

You can only accuse; what you cannot do is prove anything by showing me where I am wrong about anything.

@Suzianne said
No we did not.

The rest of your argument is therefore moot.

Almost nothing you said in this post is true.

But your Führer said it, so you must accept it as gospel.

Therein lies the failure of your premise.

They allowed millions to come in and kept telling everyone the border was secure, they lied through their teeth and you are still defending them, how brainwashed have you become?

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
And you know nothing.

I know you cannot show me my errors; you can only make proclamations, and you disappear when details start to get discussed.

@KellyJay said
I know you cannot show me my errors; you can only make proclamations, and you disappear when details start to get discussed.

Your errors are so vast Kelly I wouldn't even know where to start. (No kidding). That applies to religion and politics.

@Suzianne said
Okay, Memphis, I could believe. But Bradford?

Apparently he works in a fish and chip shop in Bradford.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Your errors are so vast Kelly I wouldn't even know where to start. (No kidding). That applies to religion and politics.

All you do is talk smack with nothing to back it up; choose one error you think in science I'm in error and show me. Outside of your opinion, you got nothing.

@KellyJay said
All you do is talk smack with nothing to back it up; choose one error you think in science I'm in error and show me. Outside of your opinion, you got nothing.

There is overwhelming and compelling evidence that we evolved as a species and that the universe is billions of years old.

There is nothing anyone could post here in this forum that would convince you (or Galverston) otherwise, tunnel visioned as you both are. In contrast, your religious beliefs stand outside of science and belong firmly in a bygone age.

Fact.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
There is overwhelming and compelling evidence that we evolved as a species and that the universe is billions of years old.

There is nothing anyone could post here in this forum that would convince you (or Galverston) otherwise, tunnel visioned as you both are. In contrast, your religious beliefs stand outside of science and belong firmly in a bygone age.

Fact.

As I said, you have an opinion; no one knows how the universe got here or the age. Without a doubt, we have no idea how life began, and the more we learn about life, the harder it is to come up with a possible scenario that could explain it, without God. The best you can say is it may have happened this way or that. That isn't overwhelming evidence that is a worldview narrative you believe in.

@KellyJay said
All you do is talk smack with nothing to back it up; choose one error you think in science I'm in error and show me. Outside of your opinion, you got nothing.

Wow. It is pointless to keep up any discussions with them on just about any subject. It always turns into these silly attacks and it is basically a waste of time dealing with them. They have no desire to do anything but argue.....

@galveston75 said
Wow. It is pointless to keep up any discussions with them on just about any subject. It always turns into these silly attacks and it is basically a waste of time dealing with them. They have no desire to do anything but argue.....

No, to argue would mean points are presented and defended, they just say you are wrong and move on.

@KellyJay said
No, to argue would mean points are presented and defended, they just say you are wrong and move on.

You're wrong. Let's just move on.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
You're wrong. Let's just move on.

Like I said, you spout what you think and move on.