09 Apr '18 17:38>
Originally posted by @sonshipNamaste
I see. Thanks.
😵
Originally posted by @philokalia1. It is not a Buddhist tradition! It is a movement of Buddhists eager to apply the insights from meditation practice and Dharma teachings to situations of social, political, environmental, and economic suffering and injustice.
(1) It is relatively new and is an extremely important part of Buddhism.
(2) SO a Koan is some form of skillful means for introducing an idea. I do not believe I contradicted that at all but rather affirmed it.
(3) These sorts of Zen koans are also given to laypersons who are scarcely initiates.
(4) I do not really get the passive aggression ...[text shortened]... an in a similar way to how I did:
http://taosangha-na.com/blog/the-sound-of-one-hand-clapping/
Originally posted by @philokaliaWiki means nothing to me. My sources are the Prajnaparamita, Ratnakuta, Avatamsaka and Mahaprajnaparamitopadesa literature.
Saying that this is the total foundation of it is off:
The teachings of Zen include various sources of Mahayana thought, especially Yogachara, the Tathāgatagarbha sūtras and the Huayan school, with their emphasis on Buddha-nature, totality, and the Bodhisattva-ideal.[8][9] The Prajñāpāramitā literature[10] and, to a lesser extent, Madhyamaka h ...[text shortened]... the 11th century during the Muslim incursion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogachara
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelTake care of you and your boy and yours, Karoly!
Do not mistake the finger pointing to the moon for the moon itself, indeed
Cheers bro
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeLife is an illusion
Just not Zen.
(Life is an illusion).
Originally posted by @black-beetleMy circle of friend grows by one. Time for joy.
Take care of you and your boy and yours, Karoly!
😵
Originally posted by @black-beetle(1) I did not say it was a tradition. It is quite new. It is also very important because we live in an age of democratization. Just as how the ethical teachings of Chrsitianity have large ramifications, so do the ethical teachings of Buddhism, and they inevitably enter the political sphere.
1. It is not a Buddhist tradition! It is a movement of Buddhists eager to apply the insights from meditation practice and Dharma teachings to situations of social, political, environmental, and economic suffering and injustice.
2. Koans never introduce an "idea". All the ideas are part of the conceptual awareness of the mind, they belong to the rela ...[text shortened]... s a corrective. Sunyata is empty of inherent existence, that is.
May All Beings Be Happy
😵
Originally posted by @philokalia1. Engaged Buddhism is just what I told you. The fact that the subject of your Master is Engaged Buddhism ain't mean you perceive the Dharma the way a Ch'an initiate or a Yogacarin or a Madyamika perceive it. There is a reason for it.
(1) I did not say it was a tradition. It is quite new. It is also very important because we live in an age of democratization. Just as how the ethical teachings of Chrsitianity have large ramifications, so do the ethical teachings of Buddhism, and they inevitably enter the political sphere.
(2) And here in Korea they give koans out to laypersons that ...[text shortened]... ine but perhaps you would want to be more polite about it and try to explain your position more.
Originally posted by @black-beetleListen to this c ***
1. Engaged Buddhism is just what I told you. The fact that the subject of your Master is Engaged Buddhism ain't mean you perceive the Dharma the way a Ch'an initiate or a Yogacarin or a Madyamika perceive it. There is a reason for it.
2. If the monks in your country want to give koans to laypersons, so be it. Instead of our conversation, I could wel ...[text shortened]... osition, so you will get no position from me.
Thank you so much for your time.
Namaste
😵
Originally posted by @black-beetle
1. Engaged Buddhism is just what I told you. The fact that the subject of your Master is Engaged Buddhism ain't mean you perceive the Dharma the way a Ch'an initiate or a Yogacarin or a Madyamika perceive it. There is a reason for it.
2. If the monks in your country want to give koans to laypersons, so be it. Instead of our conversation, I could wel ...[text shortened]... osition, so you will get no position from me.
Thank you so much for your time.
Namaste
😵
Originally posted by @black-beetle...And I had thought koans were a way for your teacher to give you no useful information while making you do all the work on a problem that doesn't exist. This leaves the teacher free to enjoy some saki in her little spartan cell.
In fact koans were used as skillful means in order to promote non-conceptual awareness of persons well trained in a specific Buddhist tradition but who could not pass the Barrier of the Patriarchs and thus were unable to get directly enlightenment. ...
Originally posted by @apathistThey exhaust the rational mind old chap, allowing for enlightenment.
And I had thought koans were a way for your teacher to give you no useful information while making you do all the work on a problem that doesn't exist. This leaves the teacher free to enjoy some saki in her little spartan cell.
I do love zen, it has been very useful for me. Except for the koans of course. Let's stop pretending that not making sense somehow makes sense.
Originally posted by @apathistThe last phrase of your post is were the buck stops.
And I had thought koans were a way for your teacher to give you no useful information while making you do all the work on a problem that doesn't exist. This leaves the teacher free to enjoy some saki in her little spartan cell.
I do love zen, it has been very useful for me. Except for the koans of course. Let's stop pretending that not making sense somehow makes sense.