1. Joined
    16 Jan '07
    Moves
    93394
    21 May '13 21:36
    im interested on the theist thoughts on lesbianism. everything i read on here regarding homosexuality seems to be directed at male on male. yet half of gays are women.

    robbies std paranoia becomes almost redundant. so does that mean the j.w's are fine with lesbians?
  2. Dublin Ireland
    Joined
    31 Oct '12
    Moves
    14235
    21 May '13 21:40
    Originally posted by stellspalfie
    im interested on the theist thoughts on lesbianism. everything i read on here regarding homosexuality seems to be directed at male on male. yet half of gays are women.

    robbies std paranoia becomes almost redundant. so does that mean the j.w's are fine with lesbians?
    I was in a bar recently and there were these two women
    wrapped around each other in a corner booth.
    The bar man brought their drinks but said nothing.
    Suddenly, this guy came in who was a regular and
    he saw what was going on and he addressed the bar
    man very loudly and said:



    Hey Gerry??!! What's with the two laser beams in the corner over there?


    Everyone just fell around the place laughing.
  3. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    21 May '13 22:503 edits
    Originally posted by stellspalfie
    im interested on the theist thoughts on lesbianism. everything i read on here regarding homosexuality seems to be directed at male on male. yet half of gays are women.

    robbies std paranoia becomes almost redundant. so does that mean the j.w's are fine with lesbians?
    dude they should have a gay and lesbo forum where you and Karoly Poly can go and fantasise about making love to any number of unfortunate victims that you like. Karoly might open with, hey ladies, my name is Raul, wanna see my crystal, we make sandwich together.

    and just for the record, the Bible states quite clearly that lesbianism is contrary to nature.
  4. Joined
    16 Jan '07
    Moves
    93394
    22 May '13 00:23
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    dude they should have a gay and lesbo forum where you and Karoly Poly can go and fantasise about making love to any number of unfortunate victims that you like. Karoly might open with, hey ladies, my name is Raul, wanna see my crystal, we make sandwich together.

    and just for the record, the Bible states quite clearly that lesbianism is contrary to nature.
    if the bible states that lesbiansim is contrary to nature why do you bother with all the homosexuality/ disease clap trap? the real reason is nothing to do with disease as lesbians spread less disease as hetro's.
  5. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    22 May '13 00:301 edit
    Originally posted by stellspalfie
    if the bible states that lesbiansim is contrary to nature why do you bother with all the homosexuality/ disease clap trap? the real reason is nothing to do with disease as lesbians spread less disease as hetro's.
    are you denying the empirical evidence which seeks to substantiate the Bibles wise and timely counsel? on what basis are you challenging its wisdom?
  6. Joined
    24 Apr '05
    Moves
    3061
    22 May '13 00:591 edit
    Originally posted by stellspalfie
    if the bible states that lesbiansim is contrary to nature why do you bother with all the homosexuality/ disease clap trap? the real reason is nothing to do with disease as lesbians spread less disease as hetro's.
    if the bible states that lesbiansim is contrary to nature why do you bother with all the homosexuality/ disease clap trap?


    It's similar to the reason he pretends (contrary to fact) that there is considerable evidence against the medical efficacy or net benefit of blood transfusions. The reality is that the question of the medical efficacy of transfusion has absolutely nothing to do with his stance: he abstains because some ancient text tells him to do so, and that would hold regardless if he had overwhelming evidence that transfusions are medically efficacious. Let's face it: he's a fundamentalist, through and through on these issues. He pretends, here and there, that there is evidence in his corner that should sway a rational thinker; but the reality is that his is an exercise in doctrinal conformity merely for the sake of doctrinal conformity, regardless of other considerations. He's very irresponsible and disingenuous in that way on these issues. Oh well.
  7. Joined
    19 Jul '08
    Moves
    77354
    22 May '13 01:04
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    are you denying the empirical evidence which seeks to substantiate the Bibles wise and timely counsel? on what basis are you challenging its wisdom?
    He or she has no clue of the Bible's wisdom. It takes a person with some level of wisdom to see and understand what the Bible has to offer and a wiser one to understand it.
  8. Joined
    19 Jan '13
    Moves
    2106
    22 May '13 04:283 edits
    At uni I knew some very political lesbians, and one odd thing about them I noticed is that it seemed worse to them that lesbianaism was not outlawed like gays, rather ignored (queen Victorias it does not exist attitude)

    I would also say in criticism, a few academic lesbians I met were borderline fascists - the ones i knew wanted to ban all straight men from there room in the uni (even an electrician! they were nuts) and radical feminism is barking mad - but quite interesting.

    I'm not sure if this attitude is around today, generally I find with gays / lesbians the older they are, the more political they get.
  9. Joined
    16 Jan '07
    Moves
    93394
    22 May '13 09:31
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    are you denying the empirical evidence which seeks to substantiate the Bibles wise and timely counsel? on what basis are you challenging its wisdom?
    im challenging your explanation and understanding of the bible. when ive asked you in the past why the bible says homosexuality is 'contrary to nature' you have always responded with comments regarding sexual health issues, mainly revolving around the act of anal sex.

    so now you are implying its something else. so what is it? what is contrary to nature about homosexuality?
  10. Joined
    16 Jan '07
    Moves
    93394
    22 May '13 09:35
    Originally posted by galveston75
    He or she has no clue of the Bible's wisdom. It takes a person with some level of wisdom to see and understand what the Bible has to offer and a wiser one to understand it.
    its doesnt take much wisdom to figure out what sex i am, but slightly more wisdom than you seem to have.
  11. Joined
    16 Jan '07
    Moves
    93394
    22 May '13 09:38
    Originally posted by e4chris
    At uni I knew some very political lesbians, and one odd thing about them I noticed is that it seemed worse to them that lesbianaism was not outlawed like gays, rather ignored (queen Victorias it does not exist attitude)

    I would also say in criticism, a few academic lesbians I met were borderline fascists - the ones i knew wanted to ban all straight men fr ...[text shortened]... d today, generally I find with gays / lesbians the older they are, the more political they get.
    when i was at uni i met some political people and some fascist people and ive noticed that people get more political as they get older.


    see, it still makes perfect sense without the word lesbian.
  12. Joined
    19 Jan '13
    Moves
    2106
    22 May '13 09:501 edit
    Originally posted by stellspalfie
    when i was at uni i met some political people and some fascist people and ive noticed that people get more political as they get older.


    see, it still makes perfect sense without the word lesbian.
    you started the lesbian thread, was i supposed to say something about mormons instead? 🙂
  13. Joined
    16 Jan '07
    Moves
    93394
    22 May '13 09:55
    Originally posted by e4chris
    you started the lesbian thread, was i supposed to say aomething about mormons instead? 🙂
    only lesbian mormons!!!


    it seemed you were making generalizations about lesbians based on a few you had known. i just wanted to point out that what you wrote is applicable to all genders and sexual orientations.
  14. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    22 May '13 18:43
    Originally posted by stellspalfie
    im challenging your explanation and understanding of the bible. when ive asked you in the past why the bible says homosexuality is 'contrary to nature' you have always responded with comments regarding sexual health issues, mainly revolving around the act of anal sex.

    so now you are implying its something else. so what is it? what is contrary to nature about homosexuality?
    I am not implying its anything else, you were shown the physiology of the human body, it substantiates the Biblical claim that homosexuality is unnatural. Its perfectly simple, you have a premise and you find substantive evidence to support the premise. Why this is difficult to understand i cannot say.
  15. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    22 May '13 18:45
    Originally posted by e4chris
    you started the lesbian thread, was i supposed to say something about mormons instead? 🙂
    He's a fantasy merchant, him and Karoly Poly.
Back to Top