23 May 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieJW's represent 0.008% of the total Christians on the planet. That's empirical data, you belong to a fringe religious minority.
On the contrary the use of the term fringe is an attempt to justify your argument by attacking an organisation claiming that its work is insignificant compared to the whole. The same can be said of blinded, an attempt to justify your stance by diminishing the efficacy of another based on the fallacy that one cannot see anything but ones own side of the argument. Need i go on?
You are blinded, remember that quote from you I had posted on my profile? It said you were only interested in seeking evidence which supports your claims, you've also admitted on this forum to not reading anything which contradicts your religious beliefs.
Need I go on?
23 May 13
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper Knobyes, but an attempt to state because we are relatively small in comparison to others means that we are part of a problem, although small is fallacious, there is no evidence that our size has any bearing on whether we contribute to any problem, in fact, its not even been determined if the problem is really a problem.
JW's represent 0.008% of the total Christians on the planet. That's empirical data, you belong to a fringe religious minority.
You are blinded, remember that quote from you I had posted on my profile? It said you were only interested in seeking evidence which supports your claims, you've also admitted on this forum to not reading anything which contradicts your religious beliefs.
Need I go on?
you have used a fallacious argument claiming that ones religious disposition makes them unable to see the perspective from another point of view, a fallacy. One may very well be able to see but disagree with others perspective, this makes the term, blinded, quite fallacious.
23 May 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou cannot say or you don't want to say?
I cannot say, but the fact of the matter is, anal sex is the sine qua non for many gay men, and lesbians are not unknown to strap artificial members to their bodies and also engage in it.
The data shows that about 50% of gay men have anal sex, as for lesbians who use strap-ons, where's the health risk?
23 May 13
Originally posted by Proper Knobthe data, what data? as for lesbos, its already been established that the anus is not a fit orifice for penetration, with an artificial member or otherwise. Are you denying the physiology of the human body?
You cannot say or you don't want to say?
The data shows that about 50% of gay men have anal sex, as for lesbians who use strap-ons, where's the health risk?
23 May 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour organisation distributes anti gay literature.
yes, but an attempt to state because we are relatively small in comparison to others means that we are part of a problem, although small is fallacious, there is no evidence that our size has any bearing on whether we contribute to any problem, in fact, its not even been determined if the problem is really a problem.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
23 May 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieim unclear of what you are asking. are you asking me to provide evidence that you have said homosexual sex is unclean? or are you asking me to prove it is clean?
that is what i am asking you, so far you have failed to produce any reference.
for the purposes of clarity, do you or the bible consider homosexual sex to be unclean?
23 May 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo what are the health risks for lesbians using dildos for anal satisfaction?
the data, what data? as for lesbos, its already been established that the anus is not a fit orifice for penetration, with an artificial member or otherwise. Are you denying the physiology of the human body?
23 May 13
Originally posted by stellspalfieI am not even going to dignify this jive talk, either talk straight or put something into the conversation that does not rely on obfuscation for its efficacy.
im unclear of what you are asking. are you asking me to provide evidence that you have said homosexual sex is unclean? or are you asking me to prove it is clean?
for the purposes of clarity, do you or the bible consider homosexual sex to be unclean?
23 May 13
Originally posted by Proper KnobI do not know, i have never studied it, but what is clear is that anal sex is certainly more commonly practised than ever before, among homosexual and heterosexuals.
So what are the health risks for lesbians using dildos for anal satisfaction?
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
23 May 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieim asking you to clarify your position.
I am not even going to dignify this jive talk, either talk straight or put something into the conversation that does not rely on obfuscation for its efficacy.
do you or the bible consider homosexual sex to be unclean?
23 May 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI haven't made a claim that someone's religious disposition makes them unable to see the perspective from another point of view, I'm stating it applies specifically to you. You have admitted as such on this very forum, how you can even begin to try and deny it is beyond me.
yes, but an attempt to state because we are relatively small in comparison to others means that we are part of a problem, although small is fallacious, there is no evidence that our size has any bearing on whether we contribute to any problem, in fact, its not even been determined if the problem is really a problem.
you have used a fallacious argu ...[text shortened]... ble to see but disagree with others perspective, this makes the term, blinded, quite fallacious.