Originally posted by SuzianneSo you can't be bothered to say something about the morality of marital rape, but you can be bothered to type out a relative long scornful forum put down that carefully avoids the thread topic? Do you want people to emulate your posting style?
Frankly, I can't be bothered with whatever EITHER of you have to say on this, or any subject, because we all know you and he are so busy posturing, trying to look good, that your "arguments", as they could be called, I guess, get left behind.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou're "not interested" in condemning rapists?
I am not interested in condemning anyone, i am interested in objective debate. If you have anything to say objectively on the subject then please let it be heard, all further attempts to reduce the debate to a personal level will be ignored.
seeing that tweedle dum and tweedle even more dum have nothing of an objective nature to state and as usual attempt to reduce every thread that they enter to an intellectually stifling personal level i will attempt to resurrect the debate with an objective scenario.
Is rape the act coercing someone to engage in sexual activity against their will? If it is the case and a person is therefore coerced against their will to engage in sexual activity does this always constitute a rape. For example, a wife is unwilling to engage in sexual activity, she is however against her will coerced by her husband, does this constitute a rape.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWould you also take no moral stance on adults raping children? If you didn't or couldn't bring yourself to do it, what would that mean about your moral compass?
Really how does taking no moral stance on an issue condone it, you HAVE NOT EXPLAINED?