04 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI've answered your questions on what I think rape is, on what I think "consent" means in a marriage, on what I think "Christian principle" is in marriage when it comes to sex.
no more questions will be answered until you start answering some yourself.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieLOL. Ive only asked you one question and you keep avoiding it. Considering the subject of the question it is quite disturbing that you do so.
why don't you simply answer my questions, i have answered lots of yours?
Do you find it acceptable that a man physically forces his wife to have sexy with him against her will? Yes or no?
By the way is your reticence indicative of your need to consult with your JW leaders?
04 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou have some sort of a secret "personal morality" about rape, is that what you mean?
I am uninterested in expressing my personal morality , i am interested in objectivity, surely you will know this by now, i have repeated it often enough.
04 Oct 15
Originally posted by FMFNo i have stated that i don't see how something can be termed rape if consent has been given, this is a purely intellectual stance, i have not stated that there is no such thing as marital rape, you simply made it up.
But it's you who is making the extraordinary claim that there is no such thing as marital rape.
04 Oct 15
Originally posted by FMFno it means that i am self effacing humble person that prefers to keep his personal morality, personal, in contrast to windbags like you who have great store by their personal opinions and personal morality.
You have some sort of a secret "personal morality" about rape, is that what you mean?
04 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat "consent" has been given by a woman who doesn't want to have sex at a moment when her husband is trying to force her against her will?
No i have stated that i don't see how something can be termed rape if consent has been given, this is a purely intellectual stance, i have not stated that there is no such thing as marital rape, you simply made it up.
Originally posted by FMFThey are all too wussy, their faith watered down with secular liberalism like suzzianne and zhalanzi, or simply cobbled together with super glue and elasto-plast like divesjeester, or some crazy southern snake dancing of Hinds or the win a play station 4 if you come to church on Sunday of KellyJay or the Jesus in me jive talk of Jaywill, not a spiritual back bone among them, weak and wimpy.
It'll be interesting to see if any other RHP Christians decide to endorse robbie's claims about rape and Christian principles relating to it.
04 Oct 15
Originally posted by divegeesterSorry dude you know I don't do yes or no answers, I am interested in objective reasoning, not leading personal viewpoint questions.
Umptheeth time of asking:
[b]Do you find it acceptable that a man physically forces his wife to have sexy with him against her will?
Yes or no?[/b]
04 Oct 15
Originally posted by FMFSorry? What are you going on about?
Ha ha. Yep. Way to go, Suzianne. Take this opportunity to have a swing! Never mind robbie dragging the notion of "Christian principle" through the misogynistic mud.
The day that what robbie says has ANY effect on my Christian belief is the day I sign up for a long stay in an asylum.
Frankly, I can't be bothered with whatever EITHER of you have to say on this, or any subject, because we all know you and he are so busy posturing, trying to look good, that your "arguments", as they could be called, I guess, get left behind.
This isn't a discussion. This is a personal forum for two huge egos that can't just simply shut up for five minutes about ANYthing.
I tell you what. What if we say "You win!"? Would THAT finally cease your blathering? Maybe we can avoid another 25 pages of this boring content.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour cowardice is noted. Most people regard forcing someone to have sex against their will to be morally unacceptable on all levels and under all circumstances. It is interesting that you, a Jehovah's Witness and self-anointed "Minister of the Most High God" find yourself unable to subscribe to this obvious standard.
Sorry dude you know I don't do yes or no answers, I am interested in objective reasoning, not leading personal viewpoint questions.