-Removed-here is why,
I find your and divesgeesters propensity for reducing every thread that you enter to a personal level intellectually stifling and all attempts to reduce threads to a personal level will simply be ignored and perhaps then you will be forced to change your modus operandi and instead of relying on dirty tricks like loaded questions, false dichotomy, misrepresentation etc etc you will be forced to engage in actual objective debate, thats why his questions are being ignored.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou've been asked if you are able to take a moral stance on rape in marriage and your response has been to say that your approach is to "intellectually detach oneself and simply examine an issue and its related elements without assuming anything". Most moral people would be able to condemn rape in marriage as a moral atrocity but you cannot bring yourself to.
Has anyone stated as you put it to 'have detached themselves intellectually from the immorality of rape', for try as i might i cannot find a single instance where this has been stated, can you produce the statement?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis is nothing but a volley of evasive catchphrases.
I find your and divesgeesters propensity for reducing every thread that you enter to a personal level intellectually stifling and all attempts to reduce threads to a personal level will simply be ignored and perhaps then you will be forced to change your modus operandi and instead of relying on dirty tricks like loaded questions, false dichotomy, mis ...[text shortened]... will be forced to engage in actual objective debate, thats why his questions are being ignored.
Originally posted by FMFWhere is the statement?
You've been asked if you are able to take a moral stance on rape in marriage and your response has been to say that your approach is to "intellectually detach oneself and simply examine an issue and its related elements without assuming anything". Most moral people would be able to condemn rape in marriage as a moral atrocity but you cannot bring yourself to.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI can scarcely think of anyone on this web site who likes moralizing over people when it suits them than you do. Why does it not suit you to moralize over men who rape women?
I am not interested in moralizing over anyone, i am interested in objective debate.
Originally posted by FMFanother intellectually stifling attempt to reduce debate to a personal level and will be ignored.
I can scarcely think of anyone on this web site who likes moralizing over people when it suits them than you do. Why does it not suit you to moralize over men who rape women?