19 Jan '14 18:04>
Originally posted by PudgenikThere has been many more scientific tests since then to confirm it. The Turkish government has acknowledged that it is in fact Noah's Ark now. Noah's house is also believed to be found and his alter of sacrifice.
the Ark has been found for many years. I first heard about it back in the sixties.
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat a pair of gullible plonkers you two are.
There has been many more scientific tests since then to confirm it. The Turkish government has acknowledged that it is in fact Noah's Ark now. Noah's house is also believed to be found and his alter of sacrifice.
http://www.sunnyskyz.com/good-news/470/Noah-s-Ark-Has-Been-Found-Why-Are-They-Keeping-Us-In-The-Dark-
http://www.arkdiscovery.com/noah's_ar ...[text shortened]... r that we must consider a worldwide flood as part of geology and the resulting effect on dating.
Originally posted by RJHindsIsn't this the same argument you offer me in another thread.
There is little that can convince closed minded atheists and evilutionists of the truth of the Holy Bible. They will continually cry out "Bah humbug" to evidence of Biblical truth.
Originally posted by PudgenikI keep telling them that .. its a way of life which is putting away the old man of the flesh and putting on the new one led by the spirit.
Isn't this the same argument you offer me in another thread.
RJ, I know you want to be Christian, and you claim to be just that. But being Christian is more than laying claims and quoting scripture, it is a way of life. It isn't knowing the law in your head, it is living the scripture in your heart. And this is the difference between us.
In the convi ...[text shortened]... eful and setting yourself on a pillar above all others is the same path Satan went on years ago.
Originally posted by PudgenikSo in your opinion I am not a Christian based on what exactly?
Isn't this the same argument you offer me in another thread.
RJ, I know you want to be Christian, and you claim to be just that. But being Christian is more than laying claims and quoting scripture, it is a way of life. It isn't knowing the law in your head, it is living the scripture in your heart. And this is the difference between us.
In the convi ...[text shortened]... eful and setting yourself on a pillar above all others is the same path Satan went on years ago.
Originally posted by Rajk999I have never claimed to have eternal life already. You must be thinking of someone else.
I keep telling them that .. its a way of life which is putting away the old man of the flesh and putting on the new one led by the spirit.
But some of these claim that they can sin, live their same old worldly life, and wont suffer for it as Christ died for all their sins [past present and future ones as well]. They are saved and saved eternally. They have eternal life already .. so they claim. No need to live a new life of a change heart and mind.
Originally posted by RJHindsOf course, NOBODY would have built some kind of boat in the mountains specifically to convince people of the reality of the flood fairy tale would they?
There is little that can convince closed minded atheists and evilutionists of the truth of the Holy Bible. They will continually cry out "Bah humbug" to evidence of Biblical truth.
Originally posted by Rajk999No Christian I know claims this. It is something you've created in your head to help you seem better than them. You are like unto RJH, who takes a little scrap of a verse in the Bible and crafts it into this huge belief system. My God is quite a bit larger than the tiny boxes you two paint Him into.
I keep telling them that .. its a way of life which is putting away the old man of the flesh and putting on the new one led by the spirit.
But some of these claim that they can sin, live their same old worldly life, and wont suffer for it as Christ died for all their sins [past present and future ones as well]. They are saved and saved eternally. They have eternal life already .. so they claim. No need to live a new life of a change heart and mind.
Originally posted by sonhouse
Of course, NOBODY would have built some kind of boat in the mountains specifically to convince people of the reality of the flood fairy tale would they?
Bottom line, finding some kind of structure they THINK is a boat, is A, not necessarily a boat and B, not by itself proof of any kind of world wide flood.
There would be consequences we would be livin ...[text shortened]... totally mind boggling to me how ANYONE in this day and age could be taken in by such utter ROT.
There would be consequences we would be living with as we speak if a world wide flood actually happened.You mean like a huge boat found on top of a mountain range? ๐
So 40 days and 40 nights. 80 24 hour periods?When was the last time you talked with a vacation planner? (I'm actually gonna help your argument out here.) AFAIK, 40 days and 40 nights comes out to 40 24-hour days, not 80.
Originally posted by SuzianneWell, 40 days just means 6 inches of water per minute instead of 3. There wouldn't be much left of mountains, certainly not the soil if there was so much rain.There would be consequences we would be living with as we speak if a world wide flood actually happened.You mean like a huge boat found on top of a mountain range? ๐So 40 days and 40 nights. 80 24 hour periods?When was the last time you talked with a vacation planner? (I'm actually gonna help your argument out here.) AFAI ...[text shortened]... nd the Anunnaki]) are questionable, of course this makes the entire Bible suspect.
Originally posted by SuzianneWell actually ... yes it does.
.... Do carry on, though, in your campaign to throw the baby out with the bathwater. I mean, after all, just because some of the oldest stories in the Bible (possibly gleaned from other sources, like the Sumerians [who don't really have a great record of telling truthful stories, see Nibiru and the Anunnaki]) are questionable, of course this makes the entire Bible suspect.
Originally posted by googlefudgeGee, just WHOM are you talking about๐
Well actually ... yes it does.
If the bible is supposed to be a source of truth, and you can prove that some
of it is in fact wrong then that does indeed make the entire thing suspect.
It doesn't mean that the entire thing must be wrong, but it's claims can't be
taken as being true simply because it says so.
They have to be independently prove ...[text shortened]... eve it to be inerrant
and that it SHOULD be taken literally and SOME of them are on this site.