Originally posted by @dj2beckerSo what is this objective moral standard that cannot be rejected for obvious reasons?
You obviously won't acknowledge the existence of an objective moral standard for obvious reasons.
Your subjective opinion, no doubt.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @apathistAn objective moral standard means that some actions are always immoral no matter the circumstances.
So what is this objective moral standard that cannot be rejected for obvious reasons?
Your subjective opinion, no doubt.
For example, rape, incest, torturing an infant. etc
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you believe cannibalism - where killing the person against their will in order to eat them was not involved - was condemned by the Bible?
So you do not believe in the sanctity of human life?
This for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uruguayan_Air_Force_Flight_571#Cannibalism
Was what happened in that case, in your view, according to your personal moral sensibilities/analysis (which you repeatedly refer to as "the objective moral standard"] morally wrong/"evil"?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
3 edits
-Removed-Wow if you aren't certain that cannibalism is wrong it might be a good thing that Robbie skipped that meeting you wanted to set up with him. 😉
I believe it is wrong to kill another human being for the sole purpose of eating their flesh, because I believe in the sanctity of human life. Don't you?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhat about the cannibalism scenario I cited? It doesn't involve murder.
I believe it is wrong to kill another human being for the sole purpose of eating their flesh, because I believe in the sanctity of human life. Don't you?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @suzianneIt would not surprise me if FMF came up and defended incest and rape so as to continue with his stubborn rejection of moral absolutes.
Amazing. Morally destitute people defending cannibalism, of all things. I never could have imagined I'd see that here, and all to somehow engineer an 'end-run' around the argument and to disagree with someone they deride for disagreeing with them. Unbelievable.
Originally posted by @suzianneIt's a discussion about morality. What is your moral and/or biblical objection to eating human flesh?
Amazing. Morally destitute people defending cannibalism, of all things. I never could have imagined I'd see that here, and all to somehow engineer an 'end-run' around the argument and to disagree with someone they deride for disagreeing with them. Unbelievable.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerBut we have discussed things like incest and rape in great detail so you know what my moral perspective is already. What makes you think/predict that I would defend them? It's as if you haven't read my posts.
It would not surprise me if FMF came up and defended incest and rape so as to continue with his stubborn rejection of moral absolutes.