10 Oct '08 01:09>
Originally posted by scherzoYou know, the knowledge that something elicits a violent physical reaction
You make points here that I revoke in other posts, but your comment about using the wall for defense elicited a particularly violent physical reaction on my part.
The wall is not used for defense. It is used as a form of aggression. The Zionist settlers and the IDF who stole the land are using it for intimidation. The settlers have no viable need for defe ...[text shortened]... rs?!? It's blasphemous!! The Zionists are the aggressors in the West Bank. Even BBC admits it!
should actually serve as a reminder to you that maybe you're not being
reasonable.
The wall is both offense and defense; of this, there can be no dispute.
It protects people, but it also serves as an assault on other people. It's
really not that complicated. There are nutcase Zionists and nutcase Moslems
in that area, all of whom would love to see the 'other' wiped off of the
face of the map.
A person of sober judgment should cast harsh judgment on the mindset
of hatred that both sides espouse, whether that person is Arab, Jew or
something else. One should decry both suicide bombings as well as
sniping those lacking yarmulkes. It's really quite simple. When both
sides can chastise the hatred generally, rather than the 'other,' then
peace is reasonably possible. Walls will come down, and guns will be
put away.
As long as you continue to point the finger at only the Zionists while
turning a blind eye towards the suicide bombers (or even showing a little
sympathy for them), you perpetuate the exchange of hatred.
I am opposed to much of what Israel has done and much of what its
government has supported. I am also opposed to much of the violent
reactions that the Palestinians have responded with.
I am also opposed to some of the hateful remarks you have made about
both Jews and Christians; by doing so, you only characiture those of
Arab descent as 'haters.'
I do not know why you were banned from the Vatican. Maybe it was closed
that day, but it's not normally closed. And I have seen those who are
obviously of Semitic descent within the Vatican and St Peter Church personally,
so I cannot explain your experience, but I assure you it doesn't concord
with normative experience.
You did not dispute my point about 'Angels and Demons,' except to say
that 'it's fiction.' Do you think that the Palestian government should allow
a director to make film a fictional movie which depicts Moslems as corrupt
and sinister in Ramallah?
Nemesio