Originally posted by @eladar Gluttony is based on mass consumption. Your definition has to do with fat. Just because you are wrong that does not mean scripture is wrong.
How many scriptures on a topic do you need to make something a valid truth?
(I'm referring of course to all the times I've bumped your exchange earlier this thread and you have ignored it.)
Originally posted by @divegeester How does it feel to realise you are just another one of this lot who will never admit they are wrong about something?
I admit that your definition of a term is different from yours.
How does it feel to know that you believe your assumptions to be truth.
Originally posted by @eladar I admit that your definition of a term is different from yours.
How does it feel to know that you believe your assumptions to be truth.
That makes you......
Just like all the other libtards.
Never mind the definition of gluttony... (besides I've asked you if a person thinks homosexual thoughts does it make them a homosexual and you failed to respond, so your definition of homosexuality is incomplete)...here is the question you are avoiding:
How many scriptures on a topic do you need to make something a valid truth?
Originally posted by @divegeester Never mind the definition of gluttony... (besides I've asked you if a person thinks homosexual thoughts does it make them a homosexual and you failed to respond, so your definition of homosexuality is incomplete)...here is the question you are avoiding:
[b]How many scriptures on a topic do you need to make something a valid truth? [/b]
Libtard question. It isn't a matter of how many times.
Libtards also believe they have the right to frame questions.
As for your homosexual question, I believe I answered it.
21 Jul '17 22:43
Paul Was Wrong
Back to Top