Originally posted by Proper Knobchange is a very broad term, for even if aberration occurs in one generation, who is to
I'm only after whether you accept that DNA coding changes over time. I'm not after what it's effects are, just whether you accept that it happens.
state that it shall not be corrected in the next? thus i must state that it is self evident
that DNA is designed to vigorously resist change. So i cannot say if it does
fundamentally change, in fact i dont think it does change to any great extent.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDo you think a dog has the same DNA as a wolf? Do i have exactly the same DNA as you? How do people get convicted on DNA evidence if the code doesn't change? We'd all have the same DNA.
change is a very broad term, for even if aberration occurs in one generation, who is to
state that it shall not be corrected in the next? thus i must state that it is self evident
that DNA is designed to vigorously resist change. So i cannot say if it does
fundamentally change, in fact i dont think it does change to any great extent.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieEvery single human being on this planet as their own distinctive DNA. How is that possible if the code can't change?
change is a very broad term, for even if aberration occurs in one generation, who is to
state that it shall not be corrected in the next? thus i must state that it is self evident
that DNA is designed to vigorously resist change. So i cannot say if it does
fundamentally change, in fact i dont think it does change to any great extent.
Originally posted by Proper Knobno, no. no and yes, lol, i sound like 2 unlimited, no no no, no no no, there's no limits!
Do you think a dog has the same DNA as a wolf? Do i have exactly the same DNA as you? How do people get convicted on DNA evidence if the code doesn't change? We'd all have the same DNA.
Originally posted by Proper Knobits possible because of variety, whether this signifies a fundamental change, i dont think
Every single human being on this planet as their own distinctive DNA. How is that possible if the code can't change?
it can be stated with any certainty that it does, i have already acknowledged that there
is variety as a result of molecular anomalies within the DNA sequencing and the
proteins which are produced as a consequence.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo if dogs and wolfs have different DNA, and dogs evolved from wolves. There must have been a changing in the DNA code.
its possible because of variety, whether this signifies a fundamental change, i dont think
it can be stated with any certainty that it does, i have already acknowledged that there
is variety as a result of molecular anomalies within the DNA sequencing and the
proteins which are produced as a consequence.
Make sense?
I'm off out. Back tomorrow.
Originally posted by Proper Knobna, they are essentially the same, now if your talking a whale and an antelope, then you may have a point.
So if dogs and wolfs have different DNA, and dogs evolved from wolves. There must have been a changing in the DNA code.
Make sense?
I'm off out. Back tomorrow.
Originally posted by RJHindstake an economics course, macro and micro, then resume discussion (because you don't know what you're talking about).
The corporations and small businesses provide the jobs for the average
hard-working American. The Democrats don't understand that adding
higher taxes on those business only hurt the hard-working American more.
In order to keep the profit margins up so the stock holders are happy to
invest their money with them they either raise prices or cut jobs. Both ...[text shortened]... rats have not owned up to their part in the financial crisis, such as
Barney Frank and others.
oh and take it the debates forum spanky!
Originally posted by Proper KnobHow many times do I have to tell you there is no evolution, before you get
So if dogs and wolfs have different DNA, and dogs evolved from wolves. There must have been a changing in the DNA code.
Make sense?
I'm off out. Back tomorrow.
it? You are like a little child. It is all part of adaptation that God has built into
every creature. He did not create them to evolve, but to adapt. Get it?
Originally posted by RJHindsSo you have an argument that shows that small adaptations over geological time cannot sufficiently aggregate for speciation?
How many times do I have to tell you there is no evolution, before you to get
it? You are like a little child. It is all part of adaptation that God has built into
every creature. He did not create them to evolve, but to adapt. Get it?