@divegeester
Commentors on your "Calling Out Sonship" thread surmised the situation pretty well. You're not seeking for my truthful answers. You're stubbornly hunting to confirm accusations you hold dear.
@divegeester
What's disingenuous to always promise to answer my questions once I walk into some kind of semantic trap you set up you think I have some duty to walk into.
But I noticed some observers who notice your stubborness.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhich time zone though?
Wait, we agreed to meet this afternoon at 12pm. I've been waiting 20 minutes outside this shoe factory and you are a no show.
What's going on dude?
1 edit
I’m calling you on the trinity, your cultish church, it’s beliefs, your beliefs and your cowardice in not answering my straightforward question.
I’m not interested in your buddies and their opinions of me.
Taking it personally aren't you?
No agreement with you, no buddy of yours. Got it.
Now with all my cultish church how come you're ashamed to leave location, phone, doctrinal statement, website of any of the groups you've met with?
Sounds like NOBODY comes up to your sectarian standard. That's what it looks like to me.
The local churches have spread from Mainland China throughout the Far East. They have taken root in Germany, Africa, South America, Israel, Philippines, Russia, the US. The local churches practice Christian unity. That's why we only call churches by the cities they meet in. And God blesses the standing.
You made some positive comment about a video of a Lord's Table Meeting.
2 edits
Your church appears to be cultish;
"Appears to be cultish".
So you don't have the courage to declare I meet with a cult ?
You seem to be the one ashamed of all the congregations you've met with.
Was something wrong with all of them Divegeester?
you behave like someone from a cult.
You've never been able to pin-point an erroneous teaching.
You grumbled at some you didn't like.
You made terribly weak cases of showing any to be NOT biblical.
You last attempt I remember - "fountain of blood is not found in the bible".
You put two and two together. The Jews recognize their Messiah at the second coming and there is a fountain opened for sin.
Of course it is the redeeming blood of their Messiah - Christ.
"And I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and of supplications; and they will look upon Me, whom they have pierced; and they will wail over Him with wailing as for an only son and cry for bitterly over Him with bitter crying. (Zech. 12:10)
...
All the families that remain, every family by itself, and their wives by themselves.
In that day there will be an opened fountain for the house of David and for the inhabitants of Jerusalem, FOR SIN AND FOR IMPURITY." (12:14-13:1)
There is nothing cultish about understanding as has been understood for centuries that the fountain opened for sin most likely speaks of the redemption of Christ Whom they will finally acknowledge as their national Savior.
And I'm suppose to be impressed that you say "But fountain of blood is not in the Bible" ?
Your furtiveness, refusal to answer direct questions, defensiveness.
Refusal to walk into traps which try to control my confirmation of your accusations. Nothing new. Standard lawyering - for a layman.
You behave just like the JWs. Who incidentally also had churches all over the world; size isn’t everything sonship!
Didn't say size is everything.
Anonymity isn't everything either.
You act as if you're ashamed to tell anyone here WHERE you met, or meet or ever have met, and what are their stated beliefs to be formerly examined.
Fascinating. One claiming to be a follower of Jesus who cannot see that "a fountain filled with blood" in a Christian song has solid biblical bases if not a direct quotation.
