1 edit
The post that was quoted here has been removedgooglefudge, if I may suggest a fact of life, when you look people in the eyes and sustain eyelock they don't even notice what you're wearing for clothes or an avatar or lack thereof or nicknames especially not your doctor or nurses or friends. Hell, no. You appear as who and what you are as butt naked as the day you emerged from your mother's womb.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
The post that was quoted here has been removedNot applicable.
This is a clear and established means of responding to an original post and
does not fall foul of that rule which is intended to prevent people distorting
others words for the purposes of deception, slander, or creating a strawman
argument.
This practice does not do that as while the original quote is 'distorted', that 'distortion'
is flagged up and pointed out by the poster making it, and thus cannot possibly be
classed as attempting to deceive anyone as to the OP's true meaning.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhen I look people in the eye's and sustain 'eyelock' they get worried and run away.
googlefudge, if I may suggest a fact of life, when you look people in the eyes and sustain eyelock they don't even notice what you're wearing for clothes or an avatar or lack thereof or nicknames especially not your doctor or nurses or friends. Hell, no. You appear as who and what you are as butt naked as the day you emerged from your mother's womb.
May I suggest you shove your 'fact of life' gibberish up your posterior until such time
as you have grown up and learned that you are not the Riddler and have learned how
to communicate clearly and effectively.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyAre you admitting here that you post in the way that you post because you have an avatar and nickname and that "who and what you are" is different when you are away from here?
googlefudge, if I may suggest a fact of life, when you look people in the eyes and sustain eyelock they don't even notice what you're wearing for clothes or an avatar or lack thereof or nicknames especially not your doctor or nurses or friends. Hell, no. You appear as who and what you are as butt naked as the day you emerged from your mother's womb.
Originally posted by googlefudgeWhatever you say, Russfudge.
Not applicable.
This is a clear and established means of responding to an original post and
does not fall foul of that rule which is intended to prevent people distorting
others words for the purposes of deception, slander, or creating a strawman
argument.
This practice does not do that as while the original quote is 'distorted', that 'distor ...[text shortened]... d thus cannot possibly be
classed as attempting to deceive anyone as to the OP's true meaning.
Originally posted by googlefudge"When I look people in the eye's [?] and sustain eyelock they get worried and run away." -googlfudge
When I look people in the eye's and sustain 'eyelock' they get worried and run away.
May I suggest you shove your 'fact of life' gibberish up your posterior until such time
as you have grown up and learned that you are not the Riddler and have learned how
to communicate clearly and effectively.
And who pray tell is "they"?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyOriginally posted by divegeester 6 pages ago:I wonder if any readers would be interested in hazarding a guess at what Grampy Bobby's "unstated purpose" is behind his OP... Any takers....?
That "unstated purpose" is being fulfilled beyond expectations. (Page 8)
My answer: A demonstration of the complete array of passive aggressive weaponry at his disposal?
Originally posted by FMFad hominem
Originally posted by divegeester 6 pages ago:I wonder if any readers would be interested in hazarding a guess at what Grampy Bobby's [b]"unstated purpose" is behind his OP... Any takers....?
My answer: A demonstration of the complete array of passive aggressive weaponry at his disposal?[/b]
adj. Appealing to personal considerations rather than to logic or reason:
Debaters should avoid ad hominem arguments that question their opponents' motives.
Again another rather transparent attempt and trying too hard to be a legendary troll.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAd hominem? Not so. "A demonstration of the complete array of passive aggressive weaponry at his disposal" is a description. 😉
ad hominem
Debaters should avoid ad hominem arguments that question their opponents' motives.
I rather think questioning his motives was what Grampy Bobby wanted people to do when he talked enigmatically about his "unstated purpose".