- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by RJHindsProof if proof were needed that RJHinds and all who think like him are despicable immoral and evil.
Yes, I have an axe to grind against the atheists, who refuse to honor God and His Christ. I have an axe to grind with atheists, who spread the lies of evil-lution to discredit and dishonor our great God and Savior as the Creator and source of all life. They deserve the everlasting torment they shall receive for deceiving our children with their lies. 😏
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Glory be to God! Holy! Holy! Holy!
Just like the imaginary god they claim to worship.
Originally posted by RJHindsAnd I thought I could persuade my ginger tom to turn into a proper tiger. Oh well, another dream shattered.
Stop acting stupid and insulting my intelligence. You know they are not the same animal, numbnuts. You also know that I am saying they are the same kind of animal. They are all in the cat family. Quit showing your ignorance and do a little research on google to educate yourself before posting such ridiculous crap.
Originally posted by RJHindsAny particular sort of evolution you don't like or is it a blanket hate? Stellar evolution is well documented and doesn't seem to impinge on the biblical bollox in any way.
Not only do I believe evil-lution is wrong, I also believe it is evil and a deception from Satan the devil.
1 edit
1) This housecat is not the same as that housecat, but they are both housecats (Species: Felis domesticus)
2) Housecats are not the same as wildcats, but they are both cats (Genus: Felis)
3) Cats are not the same as tigers, but they are both felines. (Family: Felidae)
4) felines are not the same as canines, but they are both carnivores (Order: Carnivora)
5) Carnivores are not the same as Chiroptera (bats) but they are both mammals (order: Mammalia)
6) Mammals are not the same as Reptiles but they are both Chordates (Phylum: Chordata)
7) Chordates are not the same as Crustacians but they are both animals (Kingdom: Animalia)
RJ, why do you think it is 'common sense' to draw a line at level 4 rather than any of the other levels?
--- Penguin
Originally posted by PenguinBecause that is where God draws the line; and He should know, since He created them. 😏
1) This housecat is not the same as that housecat, but they are both housecats (Species: Felis domesticus)
2) Housecats are not the same as wildcats, but they are both cats (Genus: Felis)
3) Cats are not the same as tigers, but they are both felines. (Family: Felidae)
4) felines are not the same as canines, but they are both carnivores (Order: Carnivora) ...[text shortened]... s 'common sense' to draw a line at level 4 rather than any of the other levels?
--- Penguin
Originally posted by RJHindsI didn't want you to look for anything. I think you wanted to reply to someone else, someone who is at least taking you semi-seriously, rather than me who thinks you are the comedy turn.
I was in a rush and perhaps I skipped over it. But that was not my main point. The point is that you could have done better and saved me from even having to look for it. 😏
Originally posted by KeplerI meant divegeester not you in that case. But if you ever do the same thing, I will mean YOU. 😏
I didn't want you to look for anything. I think you wanted to reply to someone else, someone who is at least taking you semi-seriously, rather than me who thinks you are the comedy turn.
Originally posted by stellspalfieIt is common sense again. God is said to have made them to reproduce after their own kind. Have you ever seen a cat reproduce a dog or vice versa? If you see an alligator hatching out of an egg, you should know a bird did not lay that egg. That might be okay with Evil-lution, but not with God. 😏
how do you know thats where god drew the line? does the bible say cats and dogs are different?
1 edit
Originally posted by e4chrisNo, at least not actively. Richard Dawkins is just another Satan deceived individual, like all the other evil-lutionists. 😏
hmm... do you think richard dawkins is a devil worshipper? maybe he sacrifices goats in his spare time...
And the great dragon was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.
(Revelation 12:9 NASB)
Originally posted by RJHindsto try and be serious , (somehow i picture you in a fez)
No, at least not actively. Richard Dawkins is just another Satan deceived individual, like all the other evil-lutionists. 😏
And the great dragon was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and [b]Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.
(Revelation 12:9 NASB)[/b]
Evil lution, Darwins ideas were based on observation, in particular how certain humming birds beaks had evolved to fit certain flowers, and the flowers evolved round the birds who polinated them (why i was on about foxgloves earlier) You can see this with your own eyes, its hard to dispute. if there is a creator thats how it worked. The sad thing about Darwin is idiots grasped the idea of survival of the fittest and not much else and tried to dress it up as a philosophy.
I think denying evolution is an intellectual cul de sac. But the adam and eve story holds much more water, and its important to point out to some scientist like dawkins humans did not evolve, they seperated, and applying evolutionairy ideas to them , offering evolution up as an alternative to god, is a stupid idea.