Sunday afternoon lynchings

Sunday afternoon lynchings

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
13 Apr 15
1 edit

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Confession for what exactly, what does anyone who posts on this board have to do with the lynchings in your OP? Answer........nothing.

This is you trolling and baiting. Any attempt by you to claim otherwise is a lie.
confession that nominal Christianity is empty and devoid, what else? call me what you like, its your perception.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
again on the contrary divesgeester was the one who initiated personal remarks stating that i and my friends would let children die. Are you saying that this was not the case? If not then you will tell us who initiated personal remarks?
Even putting your OP on one side, you had initiated the personal remarks before divegeester had even arrived on this thread.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
13 Apr 15
1 edit

Originally posted by FMF
Untrue. I have said absolutely nothing the sort.
If anyone was given a blood transfusion so as to deliberately kill them or if there was criminal negligence and innocents died, then of course it would be morally reprehensible.

these are your words are they not - clearly many innocents have died because of taking blood transfusion that makes in your opinion blood transfusions morally reprehensible. I did not author it, these are your words.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by FMF
Even putting your OP on one side, you had initiated the personal remarks before divegeester had even arrived on this thread.
evidence please.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
these are your words are they not - clearly many innocents have died because of taking blood transfusion that makes in your opinion blood transfusions morally reprehensible. I did not author it, these are your words.
My words were: If anyone was given a blood transfusion so as to deliberately kill them or if there was criminal negligence and innocents died, then of course it would be morally reprehensible. Crystal clear. Absolutely no need for you to re-frame them to mean anything other than what they clearly mean.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
evidence please.
I posted it 2/3rds of the way down page 12 but you ignored it.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by FMF
My words were: If anyone was given a blood transfusion so as to deliberately kill them or if there was criminal negligence and innocents died, then of course it would be morally reprehensible. Crystal clear. Absolutely no need for you to re-frame them to mean anything other than what they clearly mean.
I dont need to reframe them, they are what they are, you think that in certain circumstances blood transfusions are morally reprehensible.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by FMF
I posted it 2/3rds of the way down page 12 but you ignored it.
divesgeester initiated getting personal, he got a reply in kind. You have stated that i got personal before this point, where is your evidence for your claim?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I dont need to reframe them, they are what they are, you think that in certain circumstances blood transfusions are morally reprehensible.
No I said deliberately ending the life of an innocent is morally reprehensible. So a pilot deliberately crashing his plane into a mountain is morally reprehensible, but the fact that there are plane crashes does not make flying in planes morally reprehensible.

Cornovii

North of the Tamar

Joined
02 Feb 07
Moves
53689
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
confession that nominal Christianity is empty and devoid, what else? call me what you like, its your perception.
Again, what does anyone on this forum have to do with the lynchings in your OP?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
divesgeester initiated getting personal, he got a reply in kind. You have stated that i got personal before this point, where is your evidence for your claim?
Two thirds of the way down page 12. Also on page 1 of course.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Again, what does anyone on this forum have to do with the lynchings in your OP?
they are sentient beings and can proffer some knowledge as to why its possible to listen to a sermon on a Sunday afternoon and go out afterwards on a Sunday picnic to watch a man being lynched. They could offer a perspective that i was unaware of, by way of example.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Confession for what exactly, what does anyone who posts on this board have to do with the lynchings in your OP? Answer........nothing.

This is you trolling and baiting. Any attempt by you to claim otherwise is a lie.
Bingo!

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
13 Apr 15

Originally posted by FMF
Two thirds of the way down page 12. Also on page 1 of course.
fine so unless you are going to get it, its gonna stay there, so why don't you make like a rocket, boost over there, copy and past it and boost ?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
13 Apr 15
1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
they are sentient beings and can proffer some knowledge as to why its possible to listen to a sermon on a Sunday afternoon and go out afterwards on a Sunday picnic to watch a man being lynched. They could offer a perspective that i was unaware of, by way of example.
On page 2 you said to divegeester: "Lets start, that would be 4000 persons your churches have lynched, mutilated, burnt and invited your friends and children to watch die."

What did you mean by saying that divegeester's "friends and children" were invited to watch people being lynched?