Sunday afternoon lynchings

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
fine so unless you are going to get it, its gonna stay there, so why don't you make like a rocket, boost over there, copy and past it and boost ?

I copy pasted it from page 1 to page 12 and you ignored it. It's still there on both pages.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
they are sentient beings and can proffer some knowledge as to why its possible to listen to a sermon on a Sunday afternoon and go out afterwards on a Sunday picnic to watch a man being lynched. They could offer a perspective that i was unaware of, by way of example.

How can anyone offer 'knowledge' about a lynching sermon if no one has been to one? You yourself said on page 2 -

'What these teachings are I cannot say with any certainty not being party to the sermons that were given.'

And

'I have stated that evidently the teachings were insipid, i cannot go beyond that, its unreasonable to expect that i can unless i have access to the sermons themselves.'

This thread is nothing more than a spiteful attack by you trying to link the Christians on this forum to lynchings. You then have the audacity to complain about others 'making it personal'.

Originally posted by FMF
Bingo!

Dear oh dear your proclivity for belief in your own propaganda is astounding. Bingo Smingo, this thread was awesome before you clowns appeared and turned it into a mush slide! Duchess64 asked some pertinent questions, JS357 pointed it in the right direction, looking for motivation and even R.J Hinds of all people managed to make a meaningful comment about how the Islamic state does the same thing but noooooo, the mouth of dweebjeester could not stick with the script, noooo, he had to go and call Robbie and his friends child killers and tell Robbie to shut up because he was morally reprehensible and had no cause to say anything to anybody. When it was pointed out that Jehovahs Witnesses have not lynched a single person after church on Sunday afternoon he had to resort to that highly original riposte of his, minors and blood transfusions. Oh dear and here are his friends, Professor Yaffle aka FMF the carved wooden bookend and his friend Noobster on the mice organ. When Baggjeester talks pants all his friends talk pants as well, but Emily loves him!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie

Dear oh dear your proclivity for belief in your own propaganda is astounding. Bingo Smingo, this thread was awesome before you clowns appeared and turned it into a mush slide! Duchess64 asked some pertinent questions, JS357 pointed it in the right direction, looking for motivation and even R.J Hinds of all people managed to make a meaningful comment about how the Islamic state does the same thing but noooooo, the mouth of dweebjeester could stick with the script, noooo, he had to go and call Robbie and his friends child killers and tell Robbie to shut up because he was morally reprehensible and had no cause to say anything to anybody. When it was pointed out that Jehovahs Witnesses have not lynched a single person after church on Sunday afternoon he had to resort to that highly original riposte of his, minors and blood transfusions. Oh dear and here are his friends, Professor Yaffle aka FMF the carved wooden bookend and his friend Noobster on the mice organ. When Baggjeester talks pants all his friends talk pants as well, but Emily loves him!

Reminds me of the rancorous little spake the Ed Harris character made in Glengarry Glen Ross just before exiting with his tail between his legs! 😀

Originally posted by Proper Knob
How can anyone offer 'knowledge' about a lynching sermon if no one has been to one? You yourself said on page 2 -

'What these teachings are I cannot say with any certainty not being party to the sermons that were given.'

And

[quote]'I have stated that evidently the teachings were insipid, i cannot go beyond that, its unreasonable ...[text shortened]... is forum to lynchings. You then have the audacity to complain about others 'making it personal'.

please see the above. If you think it was a spiteful attack on the Christians in this forum then so be it. I posted a quality excerpt form a third party site looking at a serious issue and asking for any insight that persons may have. Insight that neither you nor your cronies could provide. Heck even R J Hinds managed to do better.

Originally posted by FMF
[b]Dear oh dear your proclivity for belief in your own propaganda is astounding. Bingo Smingo, this thread was awesome before you clowns appeared and turned it into a mush slide! Duchess64 asked some pertinent questions, JS357 pointed it in the right direction, looking for motivation and even R.J Hinds of all people managed to make a meaningful comment about ho ...[text shortened]... ris character made in Glengarry Glen Ross just before exiting with his tail between his legs! 😀

I am sure it does but I have no idea what you are talking about I prefer Masha and the Bear to be honest. I am sure it has meaning to you though.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
please see the above. If you think it was a spiteful attack on the Christians in this forum then so be it. I posted a quality excerpt form a third party site looking at a serious issue and asking for any insight that persons may have. Insight that neither you nor your cronies could provide. Heck even R J Hinds managed to do better.

This was the only question from your OP -

The point that interests me is what was actually being taught at those Church services?

When you were asked for your own answer to this question you responded -

I have stated that evidently the teachings were insipid, i cannot go beyond that, its unreasonable to expect that i can unless i have access to the sermons themselves.

You admit that an answer to your question is 'unreasonable' unless someone has access to the sermons. When no one responded to your OP you launched into a baiting attack on 'nominal Christians'.