13 Apr '15 20:00>
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy you felt the need to post this complete irrelevancy in the first place God only knows. Bizarre.
I dont care that you dont care you silly man.
Originally posted by Proper Knobinsults to my personal dignity and majesty are two a penny. This is the spirituality forum, the Op contained a matter of spiritual interest or the complete lack of it, perhaps i should have put it in sports, yah think?
Why you felt the need to post this complete irrelevancy in the first place God only knows. Bizarre.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeInteresting perspective you have there, been to button moon lately? I heard you are wired to it? you and Mr. Spoon.
Have spoken to the Judge concerned, and as suspected, he said you're a plimsoll.
(Footnote: A smidgen of creative licence has occurred in this post).
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe irrelevancy being the post about the text message.
insults to my personal dignity and majesty are two a penny. This is the spirituality forum, the Op contained a matter of spiritual interest or the complete lack of it, perhaps i should have put it in sports, yah think?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI would reccommend the Debate Forum. However. Suzianne is someone to consult on this sort of thing, since I am not that good at it. She has several times coached me when I posted something in the wrong forum. I am not sure I have it figured out yet. I made many people angry when I posted about "Evolution" on the Science Forum. Now I know "Evolution" and the "age of the earth" is not really science.
insults to my personal dignity and majesty are two a penny. This is the spirituality forum, the Op contained a matter of spiritual interest or the complete lack of it, perhaps i should have put it in sports, yah think?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWe once discussed what I described as 2,000 or so years of Christian persecution of the Jews across Europe and you insisted that no Christians persecuted Jews and that no Christian would do such a thing. And yet now here you are, with these 4,000 lynchings, insisting that their perpetrators and enablers were Christians and that somehow present day Christians share some sort of responsibility for what happened, even though, it seems you agree with me that the lynch mobs had absolutely no "Christian" justification for doing what they did. Which is it to be?
they were in a church listening to a sermon on sunday afternoon, what do you think they were? hindus? muslims? siehks?
Originally posted by caissad4So what were they doing in church on a Sunday afternoon listening to a sermon if they were not Christians? What about those persons who invited their family and friends to watch, were they also not Christians? If not , what were they?
Church was not relevant . Clearly they were never Christians.
Originally posted by RJHindsSuzzianne? you got coaching from suzzianne? LOL, oh Jonah Hindus of the great Sea swallowed by a whale and cast out on dry land, that's hilarious. I will approach her for coaching if I ever need a fairy cake recipe.
I would reccommend the Debate Forum. However. Suzianne is someone to consult on this sort of thing, since I am not that good at it. She has several times coached me when I posted something in the wrong forum. I am not sure I have it figured out yet. I made many people angry when I posted about "Evolution" on the Science Forum. Now I know "Evolution" and the "age of the earth" is not really science.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI'll help you out here, even though you are too far gone to be helped in reality, you might, and I mean MIGHT, just be able to learn something on this topic.
So what were they doing in church on a Sunday afternoon listening to a sermon if they were not Christians? What about those persons who invited their family and friends to watch, were they also not Christians? If not , what were they?
Originally posted by Proper KnobThanks but its littered with in-house technical terms that assume the reader knows what they mean, look at the abstract for goodness sake. A moral solidarity framework? solidarity thesis? and this mouthful, 'a pluralistic religious marketplace'. Ill read it but those guys need their bums felt for sure.
I'll help you out here, even though you are too far gone to be helped in reality, you might, and I mean MIGHT, just be able to learn something on this topic.
You see Robert, when this debacle of a thread started yesterday I did a Google search and found a plethora of information on the topic of Christianity, particularly Evangelical Christianity, and ...[text shortened]... in the American South 1890-1929'. Enjoy.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856205/
Originally posted by Proper KnobPredominant Christian organizations disseminated a theology rooted in white superiority, and providing ideological justification for separation of the races became a primary function of white religious groups (Bailey 2005; Berends 2004; Harvey 2004; Matthews 2004; Snay 1993; Spain 1961). Christianity was used to support slavery based on biblical and evangelistic reasons (Emerson and Smith)
I'll help you out here, even though you are too far gone to be helped in reality, you might, and I mean MIGHT, just be able to learn something on this topic.
You see Robert, when this debacle of a thread started yesterday I did a Google search and found a plethora of information on the topic of Christianity, particularly Evangelical Christianity, and ...[text shortened]... in the American South 1890-1929'. Enjoy.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856205/