Originally posted by @tom-wolseyDive (among others) hasn't responded to a single post by Romans for nearly 3 weeks. (Due to him being a tireless bore). That's what you missed sir.
I looked but didn't see an answer to these questions. Did I miss something?
If you want answers to those questions, perhaps you should ask them?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeSo who exactly attended the troll AGM where it was decided to ignore us? Oh wait you’re not allowed to respond, else you would be breaking the new troll code.
Dive (among others) hasn't responded to a single post by Romans for nearly 3 weeks. (Due to him being a tireless bore). That's what you missed sir.
If you want answers to those questions, perhaps you should ask them?
-Removed-John 6:44
No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
Does that verses say or infer that not everyone is drawn of the Father to Jesus?
No, it doesn't. It simply means that since Jesus was sent by the Father that it is the Father that does the drawing. Who else could do the drawing except the Father?
So, in my opinion, you have simply started another Christian bashing thread predicated on a false assumption.
Deplorable.
-Removed-Then why are you ignoring romans? He's no where near the cad Rajk is, and yet you ignore the crud he spews forth falsely against the Christians in this forum everyday.
It is you that's backing away from standing for the truth of the gospel against a false brother, and backing away from a biblically sound Christian.
In the time I've been here I can't recall you saying anything in defense of the truth of the gospel other than merely stating that Jesus is your Lord. Sorry, but that just ain't good enough in light of the multitude of posts made by other Christians concerning sound biblical doctrine.
You're simply not producing posts that represent the truth of God's Word, but instead you yoke yourself with the naysayers thread after thread against those who do.
You've been too long away from the church. The church of God, the Body of Christ, and I'm not talking about the troll's lying misrepresentation church either.
1 edit
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYou’re a mental health professional who supervises other mental health professionals and you’re playing these childish games?
Dive (among others) hasn't responded to a single post by Romans for nearly 3 weeks. (Due to him being a tireless bore). That's what you missed sir.
If you want answers to those questions, perhaps you should ask them?
BTW, why do you continue to talk about me if I’m such a “tireless bore?” So you can run to the mods and say, “Romans keeps responding to my posts and I haven’t addressed a post to him in weeks! Ban him!”
What a devious little troll you are lol.
BTW, what would your alleged colleagues and alleged mental health patients think of you if they knew of your behavior in here?
Something to think about...
Originally posted by @dj2beckerGhost claims to be a mental health professional who supervises other mental health professionals and he also claims to have “impeccable morality,” and yet he behaves like a deceitful child.
So who exactly attended the troll AGM where it was decided to ignore us? Oh wait you’re not allowed to respond, else you would be breaking the new troll code.
1 edit
Originally posted by @secondsonRespectfully sir, if you had Romans and becker casually and flippantly discussing the suicide of your mother (as the pair did about Dive's) would you not also be inclined to put them on ignore?
Then why are you ignoring romans? He's no where near the cad Rajk is, and yet you ignore the crud he spews forth falsely against the Christians in this forum everyday.
I know I would. (And did).
It was, without doubt, the most shameful thing I have ever witnessed on this site. Romans will, of course, come along and try and mitigate the occurrence, but this in no way changes what happened. They brought up a tragic event that Dive had shared previously and sarcastically tendered it as a reason why he gave them a hard time and how they should cut him some slack because of it. Call Rajk a cad if you must, but nothing compares to that.
I'm sure, if you reflect on that, you will at the very least understand why Dive would choose to ignore further posts from the pair of them. You will also recognize I'm sure how he, even now, abuses personal information shared by other posters.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeI never did that. Produce the thread where I did.
Respectfully sir, if you had Romans and becker casually and flippantly discussing the suicide of your mother (as the pair did about Dive's) would you not also be inclined to put them on ignore?
I know I would. (And did).
It was, without doubt, the most shameful thing I have ever witnessed on this site. Romans will, of course, come along and ...[text shortened]... l also recognize I'm sure how he, even now, abuses personal information shared by other posters.
You’re lying through your teeth. So much for your “impeccable morality.”
Sad!