Go back
The Book of Amos

The Book of Amos

Spirituality

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
20 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Who would like to join a discussion about the Book of Amos? This isn’t a book that gets as much attention as some of the junk, like Revalation, but I think it is much more interesting.

I will start by noting the strong anti-commercial, anti-capitalist stance taken in Amos. Some would claim it is only a condemnation of the excesses of a capitalist mode of exchange, but I say it is a condemnation of that entire system itself. The entire notion of buying and selling for profit is under attack.

Amos 8:4
Hear this, you who trample upon the needy, and bring the poor of the land to an end, saying, “When will the new moon be over, that we may sell grain? And the sabbath, that we may offer wheat for sale, that we may make the ephah small and the shekel great, and deal deceitfully with false balances, that we may buy the poor for silver and the needy for a pair of sandals, and sell the refuse of the wheat?” The Lord has sworn by the pride of Jacob; “Surely I will never forget any of their deeds.

The profit motive leads inexorably toward a separation from god. They are mutually exclusive.

Matthew 6:24
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

Alright, that’s enough to get us started.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120526
Clock
20 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Who would like to join a discussion about the Book of Amos? This isn’t a book that gets as much attention as some of the junk, like Revalation, but I think it is much more interesting.

I will start by noting the strong anti-commercial, anti-capitalist stance taken in Amos. Some would claim it is only a condemnation of the excesses of a capitalist mode o ...[text shortened]... pise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.[/i]

Alright, that’s enough to get us started.
For someone who deplores the mixing of politics and religion, you certainly like to explore the 'promised land'.

galveston75
Texasman

San Antonio Texas

Joined
19 Jul 08
Moves
78890
Clock
20 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by divegeester
For someone who deplores the mixing of politics and religion, you certainly like to explore the 'promised land'.
He doesn't make sence does he? But he keeps us wondering for sure...Lol

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
21 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by divegeester
For someone who deplores the mixing of politics and religion, you certainly like to explore the 'promised land'.
It's a great topic of interest. Even as an atheist, I think religion could serve a useful purpose in the world. It currently does not, but it could. If Christians realize that their religion has little in common with what Jesus actually said, it could be updated for a post-theistic 21st century.

But getting back to the topic at hand, do you have an opinion on the Book of Amos?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
21 Aug 09
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Who would like to join a discussion about the Book of Amos? This isn’t a book that gets as much attention as some of the junk, like Revalation, but I think it is much more interesting.

I will start by noting the strong anti-commercial, anti-capitalist stance taken in Amos. Some would claim it is only a condemnation of the excesses of a capitalist mode o ...[text shortened]... pise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.[/i]

Alright, that’s enough to get us started.
Excuse me but I missed the part about government stepping in and taking a certain percentage from the masses so THEY can decide how to divy it up as well as decide who the "poor" are. Of course, they do this while all the while they live high on a hog preaching to us how we should pay our fair share. Of course, that is when they even decide to pay the taxes they impose on themselves.

Woops, my bad, that is in the book of Marx, not Amos. I just feel bad for the wealthy men in the bible such a Abraham and Job. Surely their wealth damned them for all eternity seeing as how they never gave it up entirely.

d

Joined
17 Jun 09
Moves
1538
Clock
21 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

If Christians realize that their religion has little in common with what Jesus actually said, it could be updated for a post-theistic 21st century.
You are wrong there that's what Christanity is about

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
21 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Excuse me but I missed the part about government stepping in and taking a certain percentage from the masses so THEY can decide how to divy it up as well as decide who the "poor" are. Of course, they do this while all the while they live high on a hog preaching to us how we should pay our fair share. Of course, that is when they even decide to pay the taxes ...[text shortened]... Surely their wealth damned them for all eternity seeing as how they never gave it up entirely.
If you have anything to say about the Book of Amos, then please do. If you're going to jabber on like a monkey, then please go back to the debates forum.

d

Joined
17 Jun 09
Moves
1538
Clock
21 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
[b]Who would like to join a discussion about the Book of Amos? This isn’t a book that gets as much attention as some of the junk, like Revalation,
Revalation IS NOT JUNK!!!

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
21 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by daniel58
Revalation IS NOT JUNK!!!
As a matter of fact, pretty much all of it can be pulled from various parts of the OT. People who say it is junk simply are ignorant as to this fact.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
21 Aug 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
If you have anything to say about the Book of Amos, then please do. If you're going to jabber on like a monkey, then please go back to the debates forum.
I am merely pointing out that there is no comparison to modern socialism today and what the Bible had to say regarding to the matter. Sure, people were encouraged to give to the poor. In fact, you might even say they were expected to do so in certain circumstances. Ironically, however, this was never imposed/regulated by the state of Israel nor was it suggested to be.

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
21 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
I am merely pointing out that there is no comparison to modern socialism today and what the Bible had to say regarding to the matter. Sure, people were encouraged to give to the poor. In fact, you might even say they were expected to do so in certain circumstances. Ironically, however, this was never imposed/regulated by the state of Israel nor was it suggested to be.
I have never claimed that there is any comparison between modern socialism and what the bible has to say. I have gone to great lengths to specifically avoid just that, but you don't seem to want to hear it.

I have never suggested that the state of Israel imposed or regulated the treatment of the poor, and am not suggesting that Jesus said they should. Once again, you simply don't want to hear what I have been saying all along.

I suggest you go back and reread every post I have ever made on the subject.

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
21 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
As a matter of fact, pretty much all of it can be pulled from various parts of the OT. People who say it is junk simply are ignorant as to this fact.
Thomas Jefferson said that Revelation was "merely the ravings of a maniac, no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams."

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
21 Aug 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Thomas Jefferson said that Revelation was "merely the ravings of a maniac, no more worthy nor capable of explanation than the incoherences of our own nightly dreams."
He also rejected the notion that Jesus Christ was resurrected from the dead. So your point is?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
21 Aug 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
I have never claimed that there is any comparison between modern socialism and what the bible has to say. I have gone to great lengths to specifically avoid just that, but you don't seem to want to hear it.

I have never suggested that the state of Israel imposed or regulated the treatment of the poor, and am not suggesting that Jesus said they should. O ng all along.

I suggest you go back and reread every post I have ever made on the subject.
So what of Abraham and Job? Christ certainly did not think ill of them for their "wealth" Nor did the author of Amos.

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
21 Aug 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
So what of Abraham and Job? Christ certainly did not think ill of them for their "wealth" Nor did the author of Amos.
That is the topic for another day. This topic is about the Book of Amos. Do you have anything relevant to that discussion or not?

I am certainly not the only one to raise these questions before. If you go to Wikipedia, you'll see there are entries on both Christian Socialism and Christian Communism. It is a current that has run through the Christian churches since the very beginning.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.