24 Aug '09 12:12>
the early mormons believed in christian socialism. under what was called the law of consecration the united order was instituted. the members gave all their worldly possessions to the church and the local bishop parceled it back out ( but not in equal shares as the better farmer would get more land than the lazier or less able farmer ). the united order lasted a few years and due to human failings it was ended. the law of tithing was then instituted as a means to support the widow, the poor and the finances of the church.
one of the major problems with the fundamentalist lds sect ( a minority lds sect ) out by the arizona-utah border is that they still practice under the united order and put all wages and property into a trust and the trust was taken over by a non-mormon on a court order ( details not necessary here ) and a non-mormon has been passing out property from the trust to members who have left fdls.
under the oath of consecration when one gives property to the church for the united order one may not claim it back ( hence the court fight when ex-fdls broke their oath and made claim on property already given ).
one of the major problems with the fundamentalist lds sect ( a minority lds sect ) out by the arizona-utah border is that they still practice under the united order and put all wages and property into a trust and the trust was taken over by a non-mormon on a court order ( details not necessary here ) and a non-mormon has been passing out property from the trust to members who have left fdls.
under the oath of consecration when one gives property to the church for the united order one may not claim it back ( hence the court fight when ex-fdls broke their oath and made claim on property already given ).