Ghost,
LIke Jesus said that destroy the temple and in three days He would raise it up. That got skewed to "He SAID that He would destroy the temple and raise it up in three days."
Accusations, need to be considered carefully in their wording and in their context.
'Roman Catholicism and Protestantism, as well as Judaism, all [have] become an organization of Satan.'
Interesting though, REPEATEDLY I asked you to consider the parable Jesus spoke about the corrupting LEAVEN added to three measure of meal by a woman. And Jesus said the ENTIRE, ... the ENTIRE lump became leavened.
(Matthew 13:33)
My request for YOUR TAKE on what Jesus meant by that as a teaching concerning His kingdom of the heavens was met with crickets chirping late into the midnight. You wouldn't TOUCH it, as I remember.
Well in brief, Witness Lee was not the first or will not be the last to see in that parable an explanation - Jesus Christ came to sow something which got corrupted in its entirety by a long gradual process of MIXTURE with a bloating element. A fermentation process which changed the whole nature into something CONTRARY to what Jesus came to establish.
So we take THAT into consideration in speaking of how the ISMs (not the Christians themselves) but the ISMs of Organized Religion have SO transmuted the nature of what Jesus came to establish that it nearly completely destroyed it. And this is of the SUBTLETY of God's enemy.
IF you have an alternative interpretation of the LEAVEN mixed with FLOUR from the women until the WHOLE LUMP was turned to LEAVEN, then please present your alternative way of interpretation.
Shrug and "Well , I don't care because, you see, I am an atheist" is a playing card at your disposal. But it doesn't terribly render your criticism of Witness Lee's comment stronger. It would be an "Argument by Apathy" I think.
Now, DO YOU SEE, in Scripture, that God's enemy, Satan, can sometimes wreck and oppose God by means of doing something with the APPEARANCE of good to it
?
Yes, you can?
No, you cannot?
Secondly, I reserve the right to ignore anything you post that comes from an external source. I am only interested in 'your' understanding of the offending sentence.
Thirdly, if your new approach is to argue that being an organization of Satan isn't necessarily a bad thing then I strongly urge you to reconsider your position.