Originally posted by whodeyAnd yet more underhanded tactics. You're pathetic.
Don't expect specifics. Its like a politician standing up and speaking in generalities. That way there is less room to critique them. All you will hear is how you need to go back and re-read posts and your not answering questions or you are blind hypocrite like Paul.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneSpeaking of dishonesty, I never said I supported the ostracization of homosexuals from my church. I only said that church leaders who openly sin and embrace it, whatever that sin may be, should step down if they are unrepentant.
Once again, I've called you a hypocrite because you support the ostracization of homosexuals from your church because they "sin" even though you allow the yourself and others to remain even though you continue to sin. It is not because you are "a Christian [or] espouse Paul to be a follower of Christ." For you to continue to characterize it as such is wha ...[text shortened]... tactics.
Unfortunately such dishonesty seems to be all too common amongst Christians.
Thanks for proving my point.
Originally posted by whodeyTo being with, I didn't say that you said that. Regardless, you initially started talking about "confronting" homosexuals that you believed were "practicing." Later you started all that nonsense about "leaders", but also admitted that ALL members are considered "leaders" in your church. So basically you still support not allowing homosexual members that you believe are "practicing" which in effect ostracizes them from the congregation. You also started all that nonsense about "openly" sinning. As I've also pointed out to you numerous times that unless homosexuals are having sex in front of the congregation, they are not "openly" sinning. If anything they are sinning less "openly" than the rich, i.e., greedy and the overweight, i.e. gluttons. You're a hypocrite, plain and simple.
Speaking of dishonesty, I never said I supported the ostracization of homosexuals from my church. I only said that church leaders who openly sin and embrace it, whatever that sin may be, should step down if they are unrepentant.
Thanks for proving my point.
I guess it never ends with you.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneI think you need to go back and reread my posts.
To being with, I didn't say that you said that. Regardless, you initially started talking about "confronting" homosexuals that you believed were "practicing." Later you started all that nonsense about "leaders", but also admitted that ALL members are considered "leaders" in your church. So basically you still support not allowing homosexual members that y ...[text shortened]... ns. You're a hypocrite, plain and simple.
I guess it never ends with you.
Oh no, I'm turning into TOO!! 😲
Originally posted by buckky"Who has the Truth?"
Who has the Truth ? What religion has the most Truth ? Truth seekers seem to disagree on who has the Truth. It must be very confusing as to what the Real Truth might be. Two plus two is four, and everything else comes to a hault. The Truth is when it comes to the spiritual world nothing is easy to understand. The Truth is to liquid to hang on to.
Christ is the truth. I have Christ. I have the truth.
Originally posted by galveston75I told him, Jesus Christ is the truth...It isn't me. If he needs to find someone
Why don't all hear try to answer this persons question in an upbuilding and knowledgeable way instead of starting off with the usual fussing? That would be more helpful to him I would think.
who can tell him what he needs it is Jesus.
Kelly
How many times do i have to say this.....
Jesus did know the truth, BUT his pure teacings are not in the bible because the bible was compiled by the ruling class who instructed the scibes what to write and what not to write.
The words of jesus have been changed and altered to fit in with the outdated and false beliefs of the old testament.......so we dont even have fundamental truth in the bible......such as every living thing is an eternal spiritual being with no beginning or end. The body is however tempory and after death the spiritual being takes another birth, but the bible doesnt even acknowleged this simple spiritual fact.
If the bible does not even know that simple truth, then what to speak of the rest of it.
Jesus condemed animal slaughter, so why does the bible allow the killing and eating of animals.......and every person on the spiritual path of life knows without a doubt, that killing animals is a great sin and Jesus was against it, so if you say you are a christian then why are you condoning the slaughter of animals and eating their rotting flesh (you have no answer because the bible is nonsense) and followed by insincere people who want to eat the flesh of animals!
Is there not one honest christian in this forum? ( or the world )
vishva
Originally posted by vishvahetuIs there one smart Hindu in this forum (or the world), or are all dunces like you?
How many times do i have to say this.....
Jesus did know the truth, BUT his pure teacings are not in the bible because the bible was compiled by the ruling class who instructed the scibes what to write and what not to write.
The words of jesus have been changed and altered to fit in with the outdated and false beliefs of the old testament.......so ...[text shortened]... esh of animals!
Is there not one honest christian in this forum? ( or the world )
vishva
Can you point to which part of the Bible Jesus condemns the killing of animals?
I will tell you why I believe that Christianity is the most true (At least for me)(Religion)
I don't think true Christianity is a religion but a relationship with our God.
*Historical data is one reason.
*Christ and what he said and did. (He was either telling the truth or one of histories worst mad men!)
*Personal experience Answered prayer
*Bible even with apparent errors
Manny