- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116952
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeTwhitehead has accused me of lying a couple of times during heated exchanges and rwingett called me a 'chowderhead' once.
Out of interest, what is the worst thing an atheist has ever said to you?
The so called Christians get upset because I won't toe the party line in here. To be fair sonship is very restraind in the insult department despite me frequently grinding his gears over his unusual beliefs.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeProbably about 95 % of those things listed are true. The only ones that I cannot agree with are that he will burn in all eternity in hell and that he is worse than Satan. All the the other things are probably correct although he puts a spin on having the same morality as a lynch mob, that not entirely accurate. What was actually found out was that he could find no moral imperative in his religious beliefs that would have prevented him from witnessing a lynching had he been present.
Out of interest, what is the worst thing an atheist has ever said to you?
Originally posted by divegeesterSo, you're okay with negative attention because it's attention? As long as we're paying attention to you it's all good, eh...
I enjoy keeping note of the American Christian attitude to dissent from within the Christian ranks. It interests me.
You've also been called a narcissist on more than one occasion.
Why is that one missing from your list?
01 Apr 16
Originally posted by divegeesterYou forgot an 'e,' just in case anyone is keeping score.
Twhitehead has accused me of lying a couple of times during heated exchanges and rwingett called me a 'chowderhead' once.
The so called Christians get upset because I won't toe the party line in here. To be fair sonship is very restraind in the insult department despite me frequently grinding his gears over his unusual beliefs.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat you said to divegeester was:
All the the other things are probably correct although he puts a spin on having the same morality as a lynch mob, that not entirely accurate.
"You have the same moral disposition as lynchers. You are ignorant, prejudiced and bigoted and think that the use of violence can be justified."
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI asked you this: "You are comparing divegeester to the people who lynched black people you mentioned in your OP?" See: the OP here - Thread 163746
All the the other things are probably correct although he puts a spin on having the same morality as a lynch mob, that not entirely accurate.
Your answer was:
"Yes to me he has no more love in his heart than them, if you have evidence to the contrary then please produce it now. As far as i am concerned his is equally as hateful, equally as bigoted.
02 Apr 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI asked you this: "What evidence do you have that divegeester is "equally as hateful" as people who strung up blacks by their necks to murder them?"
All the the other things are probably correct although he puts a spin on having the same morality as a lynch mob, that not entirely accurate.
You answered with this:
"His attempt to state that we are more morally culpable and reprehensible because of our stance on blood transfusions is motivated by hatred. He knows that in the case of minors its an extremely emotive subject and he will utilise that in an attempt to either draw attention way from the issue that i raised or attempt to discredit it me in some other way. He did after all state that I would let a child die, did he not? Does that appear to you to be a man possessed of compassion and understanding? Well you will provide evidence of his compassion and understanding and I will accept it, So far you seem unable to do so."
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116952
02 Apr 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou do realise I'm just a person who disagrees with you and your ideology don't you?
Probably about 95 % of those things listed are true. The only ones that I cannot agree with are that he will burn in all eternity in hell and that he is worse than Satan. All the the other things are probably correct although he puts a spin on having the same morality as a lynch mob, that not entirely accurate. What was actually found out was that ...[text shortened]... religious beliefs that would have prevented him from witnessing a lynching had he been present.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116952
02 Apr 16
Originally posted by lemon limeI don't remember that one, who was it it who said that?
So, you're okay with negative attention because it's attention? As long as we're paying attention to you it's all good, eh...
You've also been called a narcissist on more than one occasion.
Why is that one missing from your list?
You seem to be missing the point here, which is that I am called these things by other Christians because I publically and directly disagree with them about certain aspects of their beliefs or behaviour on the Internet.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116952
02 Apr 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDo you find the use of the term "window lickers" to be objectionable Robbie?
You all look like a group of window-lickers on a day trip to the zoo to me - divegeester
Its this phrase here, 'window lickers' that is the most disturbing for it purports to be a derogatory term for disabled people. Why divegeester feels the necessity to castigate persons who through no fault of their own suffer disabilities is known only to him.
08 Apr 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobie[BUMP for robbie.]
All the the other things are probably correct although he puts a spin on having the same morality as a lynch mob, that not entirely accurate. What was actually found out was that he could find no moral imperative in his religious beliefs that would have prevented him from witnessing a lynching had he been present.
What you actually said to divegeester was:
"You have the same moral disposition as lynchers. You are ignorant, prejudiced and bigoted and think that the use of violence can be justified."
I asked you this: "You are comparing divegeester to the people who lynched black people you mentioned in your OP?" See: the OP here - Thread 163746
Your answer was:
"Yes to me he has no more love in his heart than them, if you have evidence to the contrary then please produce it now. As far as i am concerned his is equally as hateful, equally as bigoted.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116952
08 Apr 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou have not responded on this topic I notice...I wonder why.
You all look like a group of window-lickers on a day trip to the zoo to me - divegeester
Its this phrase here, 'window lickers' that is the most disturbing for it purports to be a derogatory term for disabled people. Why divegeester feels the necessity to castigate persons who through no fault of their own suffer disabilities is known only to him.
You seem find the use of the term "window licker" unacceptable, and yet you have used the term many times yourself. Somewhat hypocritical robbie carrobie?
Sorry geester i no longer provide a platform for incessant trolls like you and FMF. You need to overcome your narcissism and I am not helping you by providing you a platform, You need to go cold turkey and change your behaviour, its simply unacceptable because all you seem capable of is being contentious.